Surgical Treatment of Acute Grade III Medial Collateral Ligament Injury Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Anatomic Ligament Repair Versus Triangular Ligament Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1108-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangtao Dong ◽  
Xiao Feng Wang ◽  
Xiaoqian Men ◽  
Junjun Zhu ◽  
Garth N. Walker ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norimasa Nakamura ◽  
Shuji Horibe ◽  
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka ◽  
Tomoki Mitsuoka ◽  
Hideki Yoshikawa ◽  
...  

Background: The appropriate management of acute grade III medial collateral ligament injury when it is combined with a torn anterior cruciate ligament has not been determined. Hypothesis: Magnetic resonance imaging grading of grade III medial collateral ligament injury in patients who also have anterior cruciate ligament injury correlates with the outcome of their nonoperative treatment. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Seventeen patients were first treated nonoperatively with bracing. Eleven patients with restored valgus stability received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction only, and six with residual valgus laxity also received medial collateral ligament surgery. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging depicted complete disruption of the superficial layer of the medial collateral ligament in all 17 patients and disruption of the deep layer in 14. Restoration of valgus stability was significantly correlated with the location of superficial fiber damage. Damage was evident over the whole length of the superficial layer in five patients, and all five patients had residual valgus laxity despite bracing. Both groups had good-to-excellent results 5 years later. Conclusions: Location of injury in the superficial layer may be useful in predicting the outcome of nonoperative treatment for acute grade III medial collateral ligament lesions combined with anterior cruciate ligament injury.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0003
Author(s):  
Agustin Bertona ◽  
Juan Pablo Zicaro ◽  
Juan Manuel Gonzalez Viescas ◽  
Nicolas Atala ◽  
Carlos Yacuzzi ◽  
...  

Objectives: Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury and Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) injury account for 20% of knee ligament lesions. Conservative treatment of MCL and surgical ACL reconstruction are generally recommended. Significant medial instability after non-surgical management of MCL can lead to ACL reconstruction failure. The optimal management for athletes with combined ACL-MCL injuries remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional and clinical evolution of patients who underwent combined ACL-MCL surgery and their return-to-sport level with minimum 2-years follow-up. Methods: A total of 20 athletes with acute simultaneous ACL/Grade III MCL reconstructions were treated between March 2006 and January 2014. The minimum follow-up time was 24 months. Subjective functional results (IKDC, Lysholm), range of motion, anterior-medial and rotational stability (Lachmann, Pivot Shift, valgus stress) were evaluated. The ability to return to sport (Tegner) and the level achieved was recorded. Results: All patients significantly improved functional scores and stability tests. The mean subjective IKDC score improved from 37.7 ± 12.9 (range 21-69) preoperatively to 88.21 ± 4.47 (range 80-96) postoperatively (P <0.05). The average Lysholm score was 40.44 ± 10.58 (range 27-65) preoperatively and 90.83 ± 3.38 (range 84-95) postoperatively (P <0.05). Valgus and sagittal laxity was not observed (IKDC A 92% B 8%) at final follow-up. All patients had normal/nearly normal (IKDC A or B) mobility. All patients returned to sports; 90% reached the level they had prior to the ligamentous injury. Of all competitive athletes, 66% achieved the same level of sport. Conclusion: In athletes with acute ACL-Grade III MCL lesions, an early simultaneous reconstruction can significantly improve the medial and sagittal stability of the knee. This procedure resulted in excellent functional outcomes, with return to the same level of sports in the majority of patients at short-term follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 263502542110007
Author(s):  
Arnault Valette ◽  
Dany Mouarbes ◽  
Vincent Marot ◽  
Etienne Cavaignac

Background: Nonsurgical treatment of concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) increases the risk of graft failure. Few published cases of medial complex reconstruction combined with ACLR with no clear consensus on the optimal technique to treat these complex injuries. Indications: A female patient aged 41 years, with failure of ACLR in 2009 and 2 revisions in 2013 and 2014, associated with concomitant nontreated MCL and posterior oblique ligament (POL) injury. Physical examination showed valgus test laxity grade III at 30° of knee flexion and at full extension, with Lachman and pivot-shift test grade III. Imaging showed normal long-leg standing axis with 10° posterior tibial slope on radiograph, and associated MCL and POL injury on magnetic resonance imaging. Technique Description: ACLR and anterolateral tenodesis using the fascia lata leaving its distal insertion on the Gerdy tubercle, with double-stranded contralateral gracilis, was completed. A new femoral tunnel was made from outside to inside, with preservation of the previous tibial tunnel. The transplant was fixed with 2 interference screws. Second, the contralateral semitendinous autograft was used for MCL and POL reconstruction. A single strand of the graft was used for femoral fixation created on femoral epicondyle to cover MCL and POL origins, and double strands were used for distal fixation of MCL at the level of hamstring insertion and POL at the posteromedial corner of medial tibial plateau. The graft was secured with 3 interference screws at 30 knee flexion for MCL and full extension for POL. Results: The results include favorable functional and clinical outcome with improvement in the anteroposterior and rotatory knee stability at mid-term follow-up. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in supplementing ACLR controls internal tibial rotatory knee stability. Double-bundle reconstruction of MCL and POL improved both valgus and anteromedial rotatory instability by restraining external rotation. Discussion/Conclusion: Surgeons should consider the need for surgical treatment of concomitant MCL injury to prevent chronic valgus laxity and increased strain on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft, potentially increasing the risk of ACLR revision. Our described technique offers a safe method for ACLR and lateral tenodesis with an advantage to avoid tunnel convergence, and medial stabilization to restore native valgus and rotatory stability and prevent increased stress on ACL graft.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document