scholarly journals Sequential adaptation effects reveal proactive control in processing spoken sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials

2021 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 104904
Author(s):  
Jue Xu ◽  
Rasha Abdel Rahman ◽  
Werner Sommer
2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 2396-2411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flóra Bodnár ◽  
Domonkos File ◽  
István Sulykos ◽  
Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács ◽  
István Czigler

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 2642-2642
Author(s):  
Flóra Bodnár ◽  
Domonkos File ◽  
István Sulykos ◽  
Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács ◽  
István Czigler

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 1324-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Kuravi ◽  
Vittorio Caggiano ◽  
Martin Giese ◽  
Rufin Vogels

In many brain areas, repetition of a stimulus usually weakens the neural response. This “adaptation” or repetition suppression effect has been observed with mass potential measures such as event-related potentials (ERPs), in fMRI BOLD responses, and locally with local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity. Recently, it has been reported that macaque F5 mirror neurons do not show repetition suppression of their spiking activity for single repetitions of hand actions, which disagrees with human fMRI adaptation studies. This finding also contrasts with numerous studies showing repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex, including the rostral superior temporal sulcus (STS). Since the latter studies employed static stimuli, we assessed here whether the use of dynamic action stimuli abolishes repetition suppression in the awake macaque STS. To assess adaptation effects in the STS, we employed the same hand action movies as used when examining adaptation in F5. The upper bank STS neurons showed repetition suppression during the approaching phase of the hand action, which corresponded to the phase of the action for which these neurons responded overall the strongest. The repetition suppression was present for the spiking activity measured in independent single-unit and multiunit recordings as well as for the LFP power at frequencies > 50 Hz. Together with previous data in F5, these findings suggest that adaptation effects differ between F5 mirror neurons and the STS neurons.


2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 107330
Author(s):  
Justina Sidlauskaite ◽  
Monica Dhar ◽  
Edmund Sonuga-Barke ◽  
Jan R. Wiersema

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document