Two geometric representations of confidence intervals for ratios of linear combinations of regression parameters: An application to the NAIRU

2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.G. Hirschberg ◽  
J.N. Lye
1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naitee Ting ◽  
Richard K. Burdick ◽  
Franklin A. Graybill ◽  
S. Jeyaratnam ◽  
Tai-Fang C. Lu

1994 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-883
Author(s):  
T. Anbupalam ◽  
K. N. Ponnuswamy ◽  
M. R. Srinivasan

Dose-Response ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. dose-response.0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyamal D. Peddada ◽  
Joseph K. Haseman

Regression models are routinely used in many applied sciences for describing the relationship between a response variable and an independent variable. Statistical inferences on the regression parameters are often performed using the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE). In the case of nonlinear models the standard errors of MLE are often obtained by linearizing the nonlinear function around the true parameter and by appealing to large sample theory. In this article we demonstrate, through computer simulations, that the resulting asymptotic Wald confidence intervals cannot be trusted to achieve the desired confidence levels. Sometimes they could underestimate the true nominal level and are thus liberal. Hence one needs to be cautious in using the usual linearized standard errors of MLE and the associated confidence intervals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document