Letter to the editor announcing the availability of RCS and transgenic rats with P23H and S334ter rhodopsin mutations with inherited retinal degenerations

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Bryda ◽  
Matthew M. LaVail
2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel T. Organisciak ◽  
Ruth M. Darrow ◽  
Linda Barsalou ◽  
R. Krishnan Kutty ◽  
Barbara Wiggert

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200
Author(s):  
Peter B. Smith
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Lawrence I. Shotland
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
David Cieliczka
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
Larry Engelmann
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Gregory Frazer
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Edwin L. Harless
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Bill Fitzgibbon
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-74
Author(s):  
Kazunari J. Koike
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document