Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 102481
Author(s):  
Tacha Hicks ◽  
Zane Kerr ◽  
Simone Pugh ◽  
Jo-Anne Bright ◽  
James Curran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Dennis McNevin ◽  
Kirsty Wright ◽  
Mark Barash ◽  
Sara Gomes ◽  
Allan Jamieson ◽  
...  

Continuous probabilistic genotyping (PG) systems are becoming the default method for calculating likelihood ratios (LRs) for competing propositions about DNA mixtures. Calculation of the LR relies on numerical methods and simultaneous probabilistic simulations of multiple variables rather than on analytical solutions alone. Some also require modelling of individual laboratory processes that give rise to electropherogram artefacts and peak height variance. For these reasons, it has been argued that any LR produced by continuous PG is unique and cannot be compared with another. We challenge this assumption and demonstrate that there are a set of conditions defining specific DNA mixtures which can produce an aspirational LR and thereby provide a measure of reproducibility for DNA profiling systems incorporating PG. Such DNA mixtures could serve as the basis for inter-laboratory comparisons, even when different STR amplification kits are employed. We propose a procedure for an inter-laboratory comparison consistent with these conditions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Whitty ◽  
John F. Thompson

AbstractBackgroundLow levels of sample contamination can have disastrous effects on the accurate identification of somatic variation in tumor samples. Detection of sample contamination in DNA is generally based on observation of low frequency variants that suggest more than a single source of DNA is present. This strategy works with standard DNA samples but is especially problematic in solid tumor FFPE samples because there can be huge variations in allele frequency (AF) due to massive copy number changes arising from large gains and losses across the genome. The tremendously variable allele frequencies make detection of contamination challenging. A method not based on individual AF is needed for accurate determination of whether a sample is contaminated and to what degree.MethodsWe used microhaplotypes to determine whether sample contamination is present. Microhaplotypes are sets of variants on the same sequencing read that can be unambiguously phased. Instead of measuring AF, the number and frequency of microhaplotypes is determined. Contamination detection becomes based on fundamental genomic properties, linkage disequilibrium (LD) and the diploid nature of human DNA, rather than variant frequencies. We optimized microhaplotype content based on 164 single nucleotide variant sets located in genes already sequenced within a cancer panel. Thus, contamination detection uses existing sequence data and does not require sequencing of any extraneous regions. The content is chosen based on LD data from the 1000 Genomes Project to be ancestry agnostic, providing the same sensitivity for contamination detection with samples from individuals of African, East Asian, and European ancestry.ResultsDetection of contamination at 1% and below is possible using this design. The methods described here can also be extended to other DNA mixtures such as forensic and non-invasive prenatal testing samples where DNA mixes of 1% or less can be similarly detected.ConclusionsThe microhaplotype method allows sensitive detection of DNA contamination in FFPE tumor samples. These methods provide a foundation for examining DNA mixtures in a variety of contexts. With the appropriate panels and high sequencing depth, low levels of secondary DNA can be detected and this can be valuable in a variety of applications.


2010 ◽  
pp. 437-444
Author(s):  
Yuk-Ka Chung ◽  
Yue-Qing Hu ◽  
De-Gang Zhu ◽  
Wing K. Fung

2018 ◽  
Vol 497 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhizhen Liu ◽  
Jinding Liu ◽  
Jiaqi Wang ◽  
Deqing Chen ◽  
Zidong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 101631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Lin Hwa ◽  
Ming-Yih Wu ◽  
James Chun-I Lee ◽  
Hsiang-I Yin ◽  
Pi-Mei Hsu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Joseph Russell B. Rodriguez ◽  
Jo-Anne Bright ◽  
Jazelyn M. Salvador ◽  
Rita P. Laude ◽  
Maria Corazon A. De Ungria
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lev Voskoboinik ◽  
Sheri B. Ayers ◽  
Aaron K. LeFebvre ◽  
Ariel Darvasi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document