The Diagnostic Value of Push-Enteroscopy, Capsule Endoscopy, Ileoscopy and Enteroclysis (Sellink) for Small Bowel Evaluation in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP): A Comparative Prospective Trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB180
Author(s):  
Nicola Plum ◽  
Andrea May ◽  
Christian Ell
2008 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
G. Iaquinto ◽  
M. Fornasarig ◽  
M. Quaia ◽  
N. Giardullo ◽  
V. D'Onofrio ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. S95
Author(s):  
Robert F. Wong ◽  
Ashok K. Tuteja ◽  
Derrick S. Haslem ◽  
Lisa Pappas ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Akin ◽  
A. Demirezer Bolat ◽  
S. Buyukasik ◽  
O. Algin ◽  
E. Selvi ◽  
...  

Objective. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with capsule endoscopy (CE) for the detection of small-bowel polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).Methods. Patients underwent MRE and CE. The polyps were classified according to size of polyp: <5 mm (small size), 5–10 mm (medium size), or >10 mm (large size). The location (jejunum or ileum) and the number of polyps (1–5, 6–20, >20) detected by CE were also assessed. MRE findings were compared with the results of CE.Results. Small-bowel polyps, were detected by CE in 4 of the 6 (66%) patients. Three patients had small-sized polyps and one patient had medium-sized polyps. CE detected polyps in four patients that, were not shown on MRE. Desmoid tumors were detected on anterior abdominal wall by MRE.Conclusion. In patients with FAP, CE can detect small-sized polyps in the small intestine not seen with MRE whereas MRE yields additional extraintestinal information.


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetano Iaquinto ◽  
Mara Fornasarig ◽  
Michele Quaia ◽  
Nicola Giardullo ◽  
Vittorio D'Onofrio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document