Response to “Re: Non-stented versus stented urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis”

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Michael Chua ◽  
Christopher Welsh ◽  
Bisma Amir ◽  
Jan Michael Silangcruz ◽  
Jessica Ming ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chua ◽  
Christopher Welsh ◽  
Bisma Amir ◽  
Jan Michael Silangcruz ◽  
Jessica Ming ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Goda Hassan Mohammad ◽  
Khaled Ahmed Mahmoud Reyad ◽  
Ahmed Ali Hassan ◽  
Osama Fouad Mohamed Abdelgawad

Abstract Background Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies affecting males worldwide, with distal variants representing up to 70% of all cases. Several surgical techniques are adopted for distal hypospadias repair. However, there is still much controversy about the ideal technique. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare between the most popular reconstructive techniques for distal penile hypospadias repair. Highlighting their effectiveness, in term of success rate as well as the risk of postoperative complications. Methods For this systematic review, PubMed/Medline and ScinceDirect online databases were searched using the keywords ‘distal hypospadias, complications and outcome’. Inclusion criteria were primary repairs; distal hypospadias; pediatric case series and standard techniques. Abstracts of articles identified were reviewed, and then relevant articles were retrieved in full. Papers were only included if data on at least one of the main outcome measures was obtainable, which are postoperative fistula, meatal stenosis and glanular dehiscence. Data were pooled using CMA software, effect sizes were reported as event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) been calculated for each outcome. Results A total of 25 studies, which included 4572 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The tubularised incised plate (TIP) was the most commonly adopted procedure followed by the peri-meatal flap (Mathieu). Few studies reported data for other techniques like onlay flap, Thiersch-Duplay, meatal advancement and MAGPI procedures, in addition to urethral mobilization technique. The overall incidence of main complications was 10.5% with comparable results among different techniques. The results are in favor of urethral mobilization and TIP procedures over Mathieu regarding the incidence of both meatal stenosis and post-operative fistula. Overall, the quality of the included studies was determined to be satisfactory. Conclusion Compared with Mathieu technique, urethral mobilization and the TIP procedure for distal penile hypospadias (DPH) reconstruction were associated with a lower risk of overall complications specifically postoperative fistula and meatal stenosis.


Author(s):  
Michael E. Chua ◽  
Justin Jin Kyu Kim ◽  
Jessica M. Ming ◽  
Mark Jason De Jesus ◽  
Manuel C. See ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castagnetti ◽  
Michele Gnech ◽  
Lorenzo Angelini ◽  
Waifro Rigamonti ◽  
Vincenzo Bagnara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document