Applicability of accident analysis methods to Chinese construction accidents

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangshi Zhang ◽  
Wenyue Zhang ◽  
Peihui Xu ◽  
Na Chen
Keyword(s):  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Construction Accidents

Testing the Reliability of Accident Analysis Methods: A Comparison of Accimap, Stamp-Cast and Accinet

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hulme ◽  
Neville Stanton ◽  
Guy H. Walker ◽  
Patrick Waterson ◽  
Paul M. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods

Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1158-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Salmon ◽  
Miranda Cornelissen ◽  
Margaret J. Trotter
Keyword(s):  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods

scholarly journals Limitations of systemic accident analysis methods

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
BALAN Casandra Venera ◽  
◽  
IORDACHE Valentin-Marian ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods

Validity and consistency assessment of accident analysis methods in the petroleum industry

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omran Ahmadi ◽  
Seyed Bagher Mortazavi ◽  
Ali Khavanin ◽  
Hamidreza Mokarami
Keyword(s):  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods

Accident Analysis Methods

2018 ◽  
pp. 173-188
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Stevens ◽  
Paul M. Salmon ◽  
Guy H. Walker ◽  
Neville A. Stanton
Keyword(s):  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods

Are accident analysis methods fit for purpose? Testing the criterion-referenced concurrent validity of AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and AcciNet

2021 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 105454
Author(s):  
Adam Hulme ◽  
Neville A. Stanton ◽  
Guy H. Walker ◽  
Patrick Waterson ◽  
Paul M. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Fit For Purpose ◽  
Criterion Referenced
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document