Technical Issues and Potential Complications of Nerve Conduction Studies and Needle Electromyography

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 685-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon I. Rubin
2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 517-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer Al-Shekhlee ◽  
Barbara E. Shapiro ◽  
David C. Preston

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Byung-Nam Yoon ◽  
Suk-Won Ahn ◽  
Jee-Eun Kim ◽  
Jin Myoung Seok ◽  
Kwang-Kuk Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 264-273
Author(s):  
Brian A. Crum

Nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and needle electromyography (EMG) should be considered extensions of the neurologic history and examination of the peripheral sensory and motor systems. NCSs assess large, myelinated sensory and motor nerve fibers. EMG assesses primarily type 1 muscle fibers. Because of the limitations of NCSs and EMG, small-fiber function (ie, small-fiber neuropathies) and, to an extent, type 2 muscle-fiber diseases (ie, steroid myopathy) cannot be excluded with these studies. The main goal of NCSs and EMG is to obtain objective evidence of disease within the peripheral nervous system and to assist with localization of the problem.


2016 ◽  
pp. 382-394
Author(s):  
Devon I. Rubin

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) provide important information in the evaluation of patients with suspected neuromuscular disorders. While NCS techniques are fairly standardized and often straightforward in experienced hands, they are fraught with a variety of potential technical problems that may interfere with accurate and reliable acquisition of information. Recognition, identification, and correction of technical problems are critical to the reliable interpretation of any electrodiagnostic study. NCS are safe to perform, but they involve the administration of electrical current to the patient and may pose some potential risks in certain clinical circumstances. This chapter will review the technical problems that may occur during the performance of NCS and review the potential risks of NCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document