scholarly journals Developmental dyspraxia: Which future in the adulthood?

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. e27
Author(s):  
S. Gonzalez Monge
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Gaymard ◽  
M. Giannitelli ◽  
G. Challes ◽  
S. Rivaud-Péchoux ◽  
O. Bonnot ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Aaron Stabel ◽  
Kimberly Kroeger-Geoppinger ◽  
Jennifer McCullagh ◽  
Deborah Weiss ◽  
Jennifer McCullagh ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. e26-e27
Author(s):  
O. Costini ◽  
A. Roy ◽  
C. Remigereau ◽  
S. Faure ◽  
D. Le Gall

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jean Ayres ◽  
Zoe K. Mailloux ◽  
Cathy L. W. Wendler

Children ( N = 182) with known or suspected sensory integrative dysfunction and who ranged in age front 4 years, 0 months, to 9 years, 11 months, were assessed using tests and clinical observations to examine developmental dyspraxia. Correlations and factor analyses indicated strong associations between praxis, tactile sensory processing, visual perception, and repeating of sentences. The major factor represented visuosomatopraxis function with elements linked by concept formation. Auditory memory delineated a second factor and kinesthesia another factor. Any contribution of the vestibular system to praxis could not be clearly isolated. The study did not justify the existence of either a unitary function or different types of developmental dyspraxia; rather, it supported the idea of a general praxis function and of additional differentiated practic skills defined by behavioral goals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document