scholarly journals Short-term pain evolution in chronic low back pain with Modic type 1 changes treated by a lumbar rigid brace: A retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Boutevillain ◽  
Armand Bonnin ◽  
Aurore Chabaud ◽  
Claire Morel ◽  
Mathias Giustiniani ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence A. G. Marshman ◽  
Matthew Trewhella ◽  
Tai Friesem ◽  
Chandra K. Bhatia ◽  
Manoj Krishna

✓Modic Type 2 (MT2) neuroimaging changes are considered stable or invariant over time and relatively quiescent, whereas Modic Type 1 (MT1) changes are considered unstable and more symptomatic. The authors report two cases in which MT2 changes were symptomatic and evidently unstable, and in which chronic low-back pain severity remained unaltered despite a MT2–MT1 reverse transformation. Two women (41 and 48 years old) both presented with chronic low-back pain. Magnetic resonance (MR) images demonstrated degenerating discs at L5–S1 associated with well-established MT2 changes in adjacent vertebrae. Repeated MR imaging in these two patients after 11 months and 7 years, respectively, revealed reverse transformation of the MT2 changes into more florid MT1 changes, despite unaltered chronic low-back pain severity. Following anterior discectomy and disc arthroplasty, immediate abolition of chronic low-back pain was achieved in both patients and sustained at 3-year follow up. Modic Type 2 changes are therefore neither as stable nor as quiescent as originally believed. Each type can change, with equal symptom-generating capacity. More representative imaging–pathological correlates are required to determine the precise nature of MT changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-110
Author(s):  
A. Amouzougan ◽  
K. Boussoualim ◽  
H. Marotte ◽  
F.G. Barral ◽  
T. Thomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2110280
Author(s):  
Camille Daste ◽  
Stéphanie Laclau ◽  
Margaux Boisson ◽  
François Segretin ◽  
Antoine Feydy ◽  
...  

Objectives: We aim to evaluate the benefits and harms of intervertebral disc therapies (IDTs) in people with non-specific chronic low back pain (NScLBP). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of IDTs versus placebo interventions, active comparators or usual care. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and CINHAL databases and conference abstracts were searched from inception to June 2020. Two independent investigators extracted data. The primary outcome was LBP intensity at short term (1 week–3 months), intermediate term (3–6 months) and long term (after 6 months). Results: Of 18 eligible trials (among 1396 citations), five assessed glucocorticoids (GCs) IDTs and were included in a quantitative synthesis; 13 assessed other products including etanercept ( n = 2), tocilizumab ( n = 1), methylene blue ( n = 2), ozone ( n = 2), chymopapaine ( n = 1), glycerol ( n = 1), stem cells ( n = 1), platelet-rich plasma ( n = 1) and recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 ( n = 2), and were included in a narrative synthesis. Standardized mean differences (95% CI) for GC IDTs for LBP intensity and activity limitations were −1.33 (−2.34; −0.32) and −0.76 (−1.85; 0.34) at short term, −2.22 (−5.34; 0.90) and −1.60 (−3.51; 0.32) at intermediate term and −1.11 (−2.91; 0.70) and −0.63 (−1.68; 0.42) at long term, respectively. Odds ratios (95% CI) for serious and minor adverse events with GC IDTs were 1.09 (0.25; 4.65) and 0.97 (0.49; 1.91). Conclusion: GC IDTs are associated with a reduction in LBP intensity at short term in people with NScLBP. Positive effects are not sustained. IDTs have no effect on activity limitations. Our conclusions are limited by high heterogeneity and a limited methodological quality across studies. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42019106336.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document