Su1786 Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Compared to Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) to Treat Internal Rectal Prolapse: A Matched Cohorts Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-1036
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Sileri ◽  
Luana Franceschilli ◽  
Federica Giorgi ◽  
Ilaria Capuano ◽  
Achille Gaspari
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 995-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Owais ◽  
H. Sumrien ◽  
K. Mabey ◽  
K. McCarthy ◽  
G. L. Greenslade ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 914-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randall ◽  
E. Smyth ◽  
K. McCarthy ◽  
A. R. Dixon

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-850
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Sileri ◽  
Vito M. Stolfi ◽  
Domenico Benavoli ◽  
Luana Franceschilli ◽  
Lodovico Patrizi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joshua Bhudial ◽  
Hemraj Ramcharran ◽  
Navin Rambarran ◽  
Zoilo Leon

Introduction: Rectal prolapse is a debilitating and unpleasant condition adversely affecting the quality of life. It is a distal displacement of the rectum through the pelvic diaphragm that produces pressure symptoms on other pelvic organs causing fecal incontinence, obstructive defecation, or even strangulation. Different perineal and abdominal approaches have been described for surgical correction of rectal prolapse. Laparoscopic Rectopexy has been proven to be an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. Objective: LPR has recently been practiced as a method of treatment for rectal prolapse at GPHC. This study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients who underwent Laparoscopic Rectopexy in the effort to highlight this practice in Guyana and the Caribbean. Design /Method: The study design includes a retrospective review and prospective follow-up of a series of 4 patients who underwent LPR at GPHC for rectal prolapse. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors surrounding the procedure were recorded and analyzed. Results: All patients were males of 29-52 years of age. One (1) Patient was a smoker and One (1) used alcohol. Two (2) patients had a previous perineal approach for rectal prolapse that recurred. No comorbidities were recorded. All patients had complete rectal procidentia. Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy was done for each patient. None of the cases were converted. All patients were fully ambulant by postoperative day one and all were discharged by postoperative day three. No short-term recurrence was recorded for three patients; the fourth patient did not complete the six months postoperative period. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Rectopexy was successfully pioneered at GPHC as a method of management for rectal prolapse with good outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document