laparoscopic rectopexy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

83
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Yushi Kaisyakuji ◽  
Katsuhiro Ogawa ◽  
Tsuyoshi Etoh ◽  
Hiroaki Matumoto ◽  
Yohei Kono ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
Sanjiv Haribhakti ◽  
Jitender Singh Chauhan

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S53-S54
Author(s):  
Michelle Fakler ◽  
Daniel James Wong ◽  
Claire Marie Sokas ◽  
Ana Sofia Ore ◽  
Aaron Fleishman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-684
Author(s):  
Obiyo Osuchukwu ◽  
Robert M. Dorman ◽  
Charlene Dekonenko ◽  
Wendy Jo Svetanoff ◽  
Jason D. Fraser ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 101837
Author(s):  
Arnaud Huaulmé ◽  
Pierre Jannin ◽  
Fabian Reche ◽  
Jean-Luc Faucheron ◽  
Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Toshiki Mawatari ◽  
Wataru Fukushima ◽  
Tomokazu Tokoro ◽  
Takahiro Manabe ◽  
Shohei Miyanaga ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joshua Bhudial ◽  
Hemraj Ramcharran ◽  
Navin Rambarran ◽  
Zoilo Leon

Introduction: Rectal prolapse is a debilitating and unpleasant condition adversely affecting the quality of life. It is a distal displacement of the rectum through the pelvic diaphragm that produces pressure symptoms on other pelvic organs causing fecal incontinence, obstructive defecation, or even strangulation. Different perineal and abdominal approaches have been described for surgical correction of rectal prolapse. Laparoscopic Rectopexy has been proven to be an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. Objective: LPR has recently been practiced as a method of treatment for rectal prolapse at GPHC. This study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients who underwent Laparoscopic Rectopexy in the effort to highlight this practice in Guyana and the Caribbean. Design /Method: The study design includes a retrospective review and prospective follow-up of a series of 4 patients who underwent LPR at GPHC for rectal prolapse. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors surrounding the procedure were recorded and analyzed. Results: All patients were males of 29-52 years of age. One (1) Patient was a smoker and One (1) used alcohol. Two (2) patients had a previous perineal approach for rectal prolapse that recurred. No comorbidities were recorded. All patients had complete rectal procidentia. Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy was done for each patient. None of the cases were converted. All patients were fully ambulant by postoperative day one and all were discharged by postoperative day three. No short-term recurrence was recorded for three patients; the fourth patient did not complete the six months postoperative period. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Rectopexy was successfully pioneered at GPHC as a method of management for rectal prolapse with good outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Kazi Nasid Naznin ◽  
Md Shahadot Hossain Sheikh ◽  
Md Ahsan Habib ◽  
Md Rashidul Lslam ◽  
Ariful Alam ◽  
...  

Background: Complete rectal prolapse is a very distressing condition. In adults, the only potentially curative treatment for complete rectal prolapse is surgery either by transabdominal or perinea! approaches. Till date abdominal rectopexy is considered as the standard surgical treatment for complete rectal prolapse, which can be done laparoscopically or by open procedure. Objective: The purpose of the study was to observe the outcome of Laparoscopic rectopexy in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse by subjective assessment and to compare the result with that of conventional open abdominal rectopexy. Methodology: This randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, from July 2012 to June 2014 for a period of twenty four (24) months. Patients who presented with complete rectal prolapse with age ranging from 25 to 70 years irrespective of gender were selected as study population. Patients were randomized by lottery method into two groups as group I who underwent laparoscopic rectopexy (LR) and group II who underwent open rectopexy (OR). Result: A total number of 50 patients were recruited in this study of which 25 patients were. in group I and 25 patients were in group II. The mean (s.d.) age was 49.40 (13.22) years and 46.48(13.27) years in group I and group II respectively (p>0.05). The mean (s.d.) operative time was 115(19) minutes in group I and 75(12) minutes in group II (p<0.05). In this study 1(4.0%) patient and 6 (24.0%) patients had abdominal wound infection in group I and in group II respectively (p>0.05). Mean (s.d.) ambulation time was 1.96 (0.67) days in group I and 3.92(1.15) days in groups II (p<0.05). Postoperative hospital stay mean (s.d.) was 3.08(1.18) days in group I and 8.16(3.57) days in group II (p<0.05). Overall patients satisfaction were 92% and 76% in group I and group II respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic rectopexy is a better option than conventional open abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2015) Vol. 19 (1) : 3-7


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 313-316
Author(s):  
Olivier Montandrau ◽  
Paola Mascitti ◽  
Cécile Boucau ◽  
Julie Cosserat ◽  
Christine Denet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Umemura ◽  
Takayuki Suto ◽  
Hisataka Fujiwara ◽  
Seika Nakamura ◽  
Fumitaka Endo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document