Management of gunshot wounds of the foot

Injury ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S ◽  
Author(s):  
R Durkin
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R COLE ◽  
J BROWNE ◽  
C PHIPPS
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
V. M. Rogovskiy ◽  
B. M. Koval ◽  
O. S. Rodionov ◽  
I. I. Avgustinovych ◽  
A. A. Pysarenko

1943 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 780-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Elkin ◽  
William C. Ward
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53
Author(s):  
Craig S. Bartlett ◽  
Michael R. Hausman ◽  
Thomas H. Witschi
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Earl W. Brien ◽  
William T. Long ◽  
John H. Serocki
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 096777202199517
Author(s):  
Charles DePaolo

Dugald Blair Brown, a military surgeon and Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, published twelve papers containing 77 case studies of gunshot wounds that he had treated in the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 and in the First Anglo-Boer War of 1880–1881. Brown devised a “conservative” method of surgery, the early development of which had been influenced by Thomas Longmore (1816–1895), Joseph Lister (1827–1912), F. J. von Esmarch (1823–1912), and Carl von Reyher (1846–1890). During these conflicts, Brown reacted to surgical practices unsuited to the battlefield and not in the interest of the wounded. One such practice was “expectant” surgery, the practitioners of which dangerously substituted natural healing for immediate wound resection. Brown also criticized “operative” surgeons who, when faced with gunshot wounds of the extremities, expeditiously amputated limbs. Viewing each case as diagnostically unique, Brown tried to salvage limbs, to preserve function, and to accelerate recovery. To achieve these objectives, he used debridement, antisepsis, drainage, nutrition, and limited post-operative intervention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-372
Author(s):  
Baber Khatib ◽  
Savannah Gelesko ◽  
Melissa Amundson ◽  
Allen Cheng ◽  
Ashish Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110308
Author(s):  
Andrew Platt ◽  
Mostafa H. El Dafrawy ◽  
Michael J. Lee ◽  
Martin H. Herman ◽  
Edwin Ramos

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: Indications for surgical decompression of gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine are controversial and based on limited data. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that directly compare neurologic outcomes following operative and non-operative management of gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine. Studies were evaluated for degree of neurologic improvement, complications, and antibiotic usage. An odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated for dichotomous outcomes which were then pooled by random-effects model meta-analysis. Results: Five studies were included that met inclusion criteria. The total rate of neurologic improvement was 72.3% following surgical intervention and 61.7% following non-operative intervention. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between surgical and non-operative intervention (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.45, 2.53; P = 0.88). In civilian only studies, a random-effects model meta-analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between surgical and non-operative intervention (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.21, 2.72; P = 0.66). Meta-analysis further failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between patients with either complete (OR 4.13; 95% CI 0.55, 30.80; P = 0.17) or incomplete (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.10, 1.52; P = 0.17) neurologic injuries who underwent surgical and non-operative intervention. There were no significant differences in the number of infections and other complications between patients who underwent surgical and non-operative intervention. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of neurologic improvement between those who underwent surgical or non-operative intervention. Further research is necessary to determine if surgical intervention for gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine, including in the case of retained bullet within the spinal canal, is efficacious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document