Living-related donor small bowel transplantation: first case in Japan

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 3441-3442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Fujimoto ◽  
T. Koshiba ◽  
Y. Ogura ◽  
K. Uryuhara ◽  
M. Kasahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Transplantation ◽  
First Case ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor

Laparoscopic living related donor nephrectomy for transplantation

2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
V. Vougas ◽  
V. Drakopoulos ◽  
I. Loukopoulos ◽  
D. Zotos ◽  
K. Balaska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor

Living Related Donor Liver Transplantation in Children

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C.A. Tannuri ◽  
N.E.M. Gibelli ◽  
L.R.S. Ricardi ◽  
M.M. Santos ◽  
J.G. Maksoud-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Donor Liver ◽  
Donor Liver Transplantation ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor

DOMINO LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FROM A LIVING RELATED DONOR

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1236-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nishizaki ◽  
Keishi Kishikawa ◽  
Tomoharu Yoshizumi ◽  
Hideaki Uchiyama ◽  
Shinji Okano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Domino Liver Transplantation ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor

Clinical Profile and Course and Outcome of Late Acute Rejection Episodes in Living-Related-Donor Renal Allograft Recipients

Nephron ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mittal ◽  
S.K. Agarwal ◽  
S.C. Dash ◽  
S. Saxena ◽  
S.C. Tiwari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Renal Allograft ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor

scholarly journals Living-Unrelated Donor Renal Transplantation: An Alternative to Living-Related Donor Transplantation?

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem Ahmad ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad Shamim Khan ◽  
Francis Calder ◽  
Nizam Mamode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Survival ◽  
Rejection Rate ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hla Matching ◽  
Estimated Gfr ◽  
Live Donor Kidney ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Living Related ◽  
Living Related Donor ◽  
Patient And Graft Survival

INTRODUCTION An increasing number of living-unrelated, kidney donor transplants are being performed in our unit. We present a comparison of living-unrelated (LURD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal transplant outcomes and analyse influencing factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed the outcome of all living-donor renal transplants performed at our centre from 1993 to 2004. The parameters studied included patient and graft survival, functioning status of grafts (determined by estimated GFR) at last follow-up and any rejection episodes. Multivariate analysis was performed for recipient and donor age, ethnicity, HLA matching and re-transplants. RESULTS A total of 322 live donor kidney transplants (LRD, n = 261; LURD, n = 61) were carried out over this period. Mean recipient age was 28 ± 16 years in the LRD group and 48 ± 12 years in LURD, while mean age of the donors was 43 ± 11 years and 48 ± 10 years, respectively. Caucasians constituted 80% of all the living donors. Amongst LRD, parents were the commonest (58%) donors followed by siblings (35%). In LURD, 80% were spouses. A total of 33 grafts failed, 30 in LRD (11%) and 3 in LURD (5%). Thirteen patients died, 11 (4.2%) in LRD (7 with functioning graft) and 2 (3.3%) in LURD (1 with functioning graft). Acute rejections occurred in 41% recipients in LRD and 35% in LURD (P = 0.37). Estimated GFR was lower in LURD than in LRD (49 ± 14 versus 59 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.032). One- and 3-year patient survival for LRD and LURD was 98.7% and 96.3% and 97.7% and 95%, respectively (P = 0.75). One- and 3-year graft survival was equivalent at 94.8% and 92.3% for LRD, and 98.4% and 93.7% for LURD, respectively (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS Outcome of LRD and LURD is comparable in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rate and estimated GFR despite differences in demographics, HLA matching and re-transplants of recipients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document