scholarly journals Gaming the system: suboptimal compliance with loot box probability disclosure regulations in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Leon Y. Xiao ◽  
Laura L. Henderson ◽  
Yuhan Yang ◽  
Philip W. S. Newall

Abstract Loot boxes provide randomized rewards in video games; their purchase is linked to disordered gambling and they are present in approximately half of UK video games. The relative novelty of loot boxes means that regulators and policymakers in various jurisdictions are still deciding how to regulate them. The People's Republic of China (PRC) is the first, and presently only, jurisdiction to legally require companies to disclose the probabilities of obtaining randomized loot box rewards – an approach that is also favored by the industry as self-regulation. This study is the first to assess paid loot box prevalence in the PRC and companies’ discretionary interpretations of probability disclosure regulations. Loot boxes were found in 91 of the 100 highest-grossing PRC iPhone games. Of games deemed suitable for children aged 12+, 90.5% contained loot boxes. Probability disclosures could not be found for 4.4% of games containing loot boxes. Disclosures were implemented through various methods both in-game and on the games’ official websites; however, consistent with the concept of ‘sludge,’ only 5.5% used the most prominent format of automatically displaying the probabilities on the in-game loot box purchase page. Loot box probability disclosures should be uniform and visually prominent to best help inform consumers.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Y. Xiao ◽  
Laura L. Henderson ◽  
Yuhan Yang ◽  
Philip Warren Stirling Newall

Paid loot boxes provide randomised rewards in video games; their use is linked to disordered gambling and they are present in approximately half of UK video games. The relative novelty of loot boxes means that regulators and policymakers in various jurisdictions are still deciding how to regulate them. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the first and only jurisdiction to legally require video game companies to disclose the probabilities of obtaining randomised loot box rewards—an approach that is also favoured by the video games industry as self-regulation. This study is the first to assess loot box prevalence in the PRC and video game companies’ discretionary interpretations of the probability disclosure regulation. Loot boxes were found in 91 of the 100 most-popular PRC iPhone games, and 90.5% of games deemed suitable for children aged 12+ contained loot boxes. For games containing loot boxes, disclosure statements could not be found for 4.4% of games. Loot box probability disclosures were implemented through various means, but only five games used the most prominent disclosure format. Legal regulation and/or self-regulation of loot box probability disclosures should require uniform and prominent disclosures to best help inform consumers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Y. Xiao

Loot boxes are virtual items in video games that players purchase to obtain randomised rewards of varying value. Such randomised monetisation methods are prevalently implemented globally. Loot boxes are conceptually and structurally akin to gambling, and their purchase is positively correlated with problem gambling in Western countries. Given the potential harms loot boxes may cause, particularly to vulnerable consumers, e.g., children, regulators and policymakers are paying increasing attention. Some countries, e.g., Belgium, have actively enforced existing gambling laws to ban certain loot box implementations. However, less restrictive regulatory approaches, e.g., requiring probability disclosures, are also being considered. Amendments to existing law and new laws dedicated to regulating loot boxes are likely forthcoming in many countries. Companies’ discretionary and suboptimal compliance with loot box probability disclosure law in the People’s Republic of China reveals how future loot box laws and industry self-regulations should be better drafted to ensure maximum consumer protection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document