scholarly journals Bounded-analytic sequent calculi and embeddings for hypersequent logics

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
Agata Ciabattoni ◽  
Timo Lang ◽  
Revantha Ramanayake
Keyword(s):  
Studia Logica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-637
Author(s):  
Minghui Ma ◽  
Jinsheng Chen

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTA CIALDEA MAYER ◽  
FIORA PIRRI
Keyword(s):  

Studia Logica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Da Ré ◽  
Federico Pailos
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris van der Giessen ◽  
Rosalie Iemhoff
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-116
Author(s):  
Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion ◽  
Yaroslav Petrukhin ◽  
Vasilyi Shangin

The goal of this paper is to propose correspondence analysis as a technique for generating the so-called erotetic (i.e. pertaining to the logic of questions) calculi which constitute the method of Socratic proofs by Andrzej Wiśniewski. As we explain in the paper, in order to successfully design an erotetic calculus one needs invertible sequent-calculus-style rules. For this reason, the proposed correspondence analysis resulting in invertible rules can constitute a new foundation for the method of Socratic proofs. Correspondence analysis is Kooi and Tamminga's technique for designing proof systems. In this paper it is used to consider sequent calculi with non-branching (the only exception being the rule of cut), invertible rules for the negation fragment of classical propositional logic and its extensions by binary Boolean functions.


Author(s):  
Satoru Niki

We continue the investigation of the first paper where we studied logics with various negations including  empirical negation and co-negation. We established how such logics can be treated uniformly with R. Sylvan's CCω as the basis. In this paper we use this result to obtain cut-free labelled sequent calculi for the logics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document