scholarly journals Energy mapping of the genetic code and genomic domains: implications for code evolution and molecular Darwinism – CORRIGENDUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horst H. Klump ◽  
Jens Völker ◽  
Kenneth J. Breslauer
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 229-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supratim Sengupta ◽  
Paul G. Higgs
Keyword(s):  

Biosystems ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sciarrino ◽  
P. Sorba
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael Yarus

AbstractWobble coding is inevitable during evolution of the Standard Genetic Code (SGC). It ultimately splits half of NN U/C/A/G coding boxes with different assignments. Further, it contributes to pervasive SGC order by reinforcing close spacing for identical SGC assignments. But wobble cannot appear too soon, or it will inhibit encoding and more decisively, obstruct evolution of full coding tables. However, these prior results assumed Crick wobble, NN U/C and NN A/G, read by a single adaptor RNA. Superwobble translates NN U/C/A/G codons, using one adaptor RNA with an unmodified 5′ anticodon U (appropriate to earliest coding) in modern mitochondria, plastids, and mycoplasma. Assuming the SGC was selected when evolving codes most resembled it, characteristics of the critical selection events can be calculated. For example, continuous superwobble infrequently evolves SGC-like coding tables. So, continuous superwobble is a very improbable origin hypothesis. In contrast, late-arising superwobble shares late Crick wobble’s frequent resemblance to SGC order. Thus late superwobble is possible, but yields SGC-like assignments less frequently than late Crick wobble. Ancient coding ambiguity, most simply, arose from Crick wobble alone. This is consistent with SGC assignments to NAN codons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document