This study examines whether client importance affects jurors' evaluations of auditors. Specifically, we examine whether client importance is significantly related to juror evaluations of responsibility and blame as well as auditor liability and damage awards. The results indicate that when an auditor is involved in litigation associated with an audit client that is financially more important to the auditor, participants evaluated the auditor as less objective, more blameworthy, and more deserving of punishment. Client importance is also found to significantly affect jurors' liability assessments. Further analysis indicates the effects of client importance on liability assessments can be attributed to independence perceptions. Despite these differences, results indicate only a marginally significant influence of client importance on punitive damage awards and no influence on compensatory damage awards.
Punitive Damage Awards in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts
