Time course of effects of septal lesions on avoidance, response suppression, and reactivity to shock.

1972 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus A. Miczek ◽  
John E. Kelsey ◽  
Sebastian P. Grossman
1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Poplawsky ◽  
Scott L. Hoffman

Memory ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 236-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Duncan ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Simons ◽  
G. E. Carvell

1. Extracellular single-unit recordings and controlled whisker stimuli were used to compare response properties between cells in the "barreloids" of the thalamic ventrobasal complex and those in the cytochrome oxidase-rich centers of the "barrels" in the first somatic sensory cortex. Individual vibrissae were deflected alone or in paired combination involving the neuron's maximally excitatory whisker and an adjacent one in the same or neighboring whisker rows. Quantitative data were derived from 135 thalamocortical unit's (TCUs), 242 "regular-spike" barrel units (RSUs), and 16 "fast-spike" barrel units (FSUs) recorded in 26 normal adult rats. 2. Compared with TCUs, RSUs displayed lower rates of spontaneous activity and responded less vigorously to whisker stimuli. Proportionally, more than twice as many TCUs as RSUs responded in slowly adapting fashion to at least one angular direction of whisker displacement. Discharges of slowly adapting TCUs were approximately 3.5 times greater than those of slowly adapting RSUs. 3. Proportionally, about twice as many TCUs than RSUs responded selectively to whisker movements in different angular directions. 4. Cells in the thalamus responded more vigorously to a larger number of whiskers than RSUs in the cortex. Depending on the stimulus conditions, two to three times more TCUs than RSUs were excited by two or more whiskers. 5. Following displacement of an adjacent whisker, unit discharges to subsequent deflections of the maximally excitatory whisker were reduced in a time-dependent fashion. The time course of response suppression was similar in TCUs and RSUs, but inhibitory interactions between adjacent whiskers were observed much less often in the thalamus. A cyclic pattern of stimulus-evoked excitation/inhibition characterizes responses in the cortical barrels but is considerably less pronounced in the thalamic barreloids. 6. The presence and/or degree of response suppression depended on which adjacent whisker was stimulated and on the angular direction of that whisker's movement. For individual TCUs, some adjacent whiskers evoked inhibition, others did not. The vast majority of RSUs displayed response suppression to all adjacent whiskers. Unlike receptive fields of TCUs, those of RSUs have small--i.e., single-whisker--excitatory centers with potent and symmetrical inhibitory surrounds. 7. Fast-spike units in the barrels displayed the greatest spontaneous and stimulus-evoked activities and were the least selective for whisker movements at different angular directions. FSUs had the largest excitatory receptive fields; 100% responded to two or more vibrissae.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1983 ◽  
Vol 35 (3b) ◽  
pp. 221-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Mcnaughton ◽  
J. A. Gray

Two experiments were performed to test whether the minor tranquillizer chlordiaz-epoxide or septal lesions could interfere with Pavlovian counterconditioning. Rats were first trained to bar-press for food on a random interval schedule on which was superimposed the presentation of a light which predicted delivery of a shock. This training continued until all animals were showing stable suppression of responding to the light. Separate groups were then presented, while the manipulandum was retracted from the box, with either a shock paired with the delivery of food or shock and food delivery in a random relationship with one another. This type of intrusion period alternated with the presentation of the light and shock. Pavlovian counterconditioning developed, as shown by progressively less response suppression in the paired groups compared to the random groups. This Pavlovian counterconditioning was in no way reduced by either chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) or by medial or lateral septal lesions. It is argued that these results rule out Pavlovian counterconditioning as a process which is affected by minor tranquillizers or by septal lesions when they interfere with the behavioural tolerance observed after partial punishment or partial reward schedules.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document