Burch procedure for stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra had similar cure rate to sling procedure

2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Michael W. Weinberger ◽  
Ann M. Geiger
Keyword(s):  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Sling Procedure ◽  
Burch Procedure ◽  
Similar Cure

Burch Colposuspension Versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

2021 ◽  
pp. 215-220
Author(s):  
Colby A. Dixon ◽  
Giulia I. Lane ◽  
Cynthia S. Fok ◽  
M. Louis Moy
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Urinary Stress Incontinence ◽  
Burch Colposuspension ◽  
Sling Procedure ◽  
Fascial Sling ◽  
Burch Procedure

This chapter summarizes the results of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy (SISTEr) trial, which randomized women with stress urinary incontinence to an autologous sling procedure versus a Burch colposuspension. Overall treatment success favored the fascial sling over the Burch procedure group, as did the stress incontinence–specific success rate at 24 months. Postoperative voiding dysfunction and urge incontinence were more common in the sling group than the Burch group. These findings supported the historical shift toward slings (autologous and synthetic) versus Burch colposuspension procedures in clinical practice.

Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence

1978 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Mcguire ◽  
Bernard Lytton
Keyword(s):  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Pubovaginal Sling ◽  
Sling Procedure
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document