Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence

1978 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Mcguire ◽  
Bernard Lytton
Keyword(s):  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Pubovaginal Sling ◽  
Sling Procedure

Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence

2002 ◽  
Vol 167 (2 Part 2) ◽  
pp. 1120-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. McGuire ◽  
Bernard Lytton
Keyword(s):  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Pubovaginal Sling ◽  
Sling Procedure

Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-220
Author(s):  
Marco A. Pelosi ◽  
Marco A. Pelosi III
Keyword(s):  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Pubovaginal Sling ◽  
Sling Procedure

Burch Colposuspension Versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

2021 ◽  
pp. 215-220
Author(s):  
Colby A. Dixon ◽  
Giulia I. Lane ◽  
Cynthia S. Fok ◽  
M. Louis Moy
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Urinary Stress Incontinence ◽  
Burch Colposuspension ◽  
Sling Procedure ◽  
Fascial Sling ◽  
Burch Procedure

This chapter summarizes the results of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy (SISTEr) trial, which randomized women with stress urinary incontinence to an autologous sling procedure versus a Burch colposuspension. Overall treatment success favored the fascial sling over the Burch procedure group, as did the stress incontinence–specific success rate at 24 months. Postoperative voiding dysfunction and urge incontinence were more common in the sling group than the Burch group. These findings supported the historical shift toward slings (autologous and synthetic) versus Burch colposuspension procedures in clinical practice.

Modifizierte Faszienzügelplastik - (Laparoscopically Assisted Pubovaginal Sling Procedure = LAPS) -

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
J Leißner ◽  
M Höckel ◽  
R Hohenfellner
Keyword(s):  
Pubovaginal Sling ◽  
Sling Procedure
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document