scholarly journals Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Treated with C-Guard Stent

Author(s):  
Giancarlo Saal-Zapata ◽  
Walter Durand ◽  
Dante Valer ◽  
Rodolfo Rodríguez

AbstractInternal carotid dissection is the most common cause of stroke in the young population. Stroke, the presence of a pseudoaneurysm, and decreased artery lumen with cerebral flow impairment are indications for treatment. Medical therapy with antithrombotic drugs and endovascular therapy with stenting are the main available options. The C-Guard stent is an open cell mesh-covered dual layer stent that has been mainly used in cases of internal carotid artery stenosis with a post-operative reduction in stroke incidence. Thus, we present two cases of internal carotid artery dissections of the cervical segment treated with the open cell dual-layer C-Guard stent without complications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Cruddas ◽  
M Joffe ◽  
D Baker

Abstract Introduction Carotid artery dissection is a common cause of stroke in the young. It has been related to the association of the carotid artery with fixed neighbouring anatomical structures. This study assesses the association between styloid process length, internal carotid artery position and cervical carotid artery dissection (CCAD). This information would provide potential predicative radiological measurements, which could prevent delays in CCAD diagnosis. Method Retrospective data was collected from two central London hospitals over five years. CCAD cases were identified from individuals who underwent computer topography angiography (CTA) of the neck for suspected CCAD. The following data was collected: evidence of CCAD; bilateral styloid process length and presence of styloid-hyoid ligament calcification; bilateral styloid process-internal carotid distance; calcification of carotid arteries and whether their position was aberrant. Cases were dissection-side, age and gender matched with two non-dissection controls. Result Three hundred and fifty-five individuals were identified. Fifty individuals had CCAD, of which 4 had bilateral dissection. In individuals with CCAD, average styloid process length was 27.5 mm and styloid process-internal carotid distance was 5.14 mm. There was no significant association between styloid process length or styloid process-internal carotid distance, and CCAD when compared with matched controls. Internal carotid artery aberrancy was significant for non-dissection. Conclusion In this study, there was no association between styloid process length and styloid process-internal carotid distance with CCAD. These measurements can not be used to predict the possibility of a CCAD following trauma. Take-home Message Anatomy of the styloid process and calcification of the styloid-hyoid ligament are highly variable and many independent factors may contribute to the risk of cervical carotid artery dissection. Radiological measurements of the styloid process alone cannot be used to predict risk and likelihood of cervical carotid artery dissection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Cruddas ◽  
M Joffe ◽  
D Baker

Abstract Aim Carotid artery dissection is a common cause of stroke in the young. It has been related to the association of the carotid artery with fixed neighbouring anatomical structures. This study assesses the association between styloid process length, internal carotid artery position and cervical carotid artery dissection (CCAD). This information would provide potential predicative radiological measurements, which could prevent delays in CCAD diagnosis. Method Retrospective data was collected from two central London hospitals over five years. CCAD cases were identified from individuals who underwent computer topography angiography (CTA) of the neck for suspected CCAD. The following data was collected: evidence of CCAD; bilateral styloid process length and presence of styloid-hyoid ligament calcification; bilateral styloid process-internal carotid distance; calcification of carotid arteries and whether their position was aberrant. Cases were dissection-side, age and gender matched with two non-dissection controls. Results Three hundred and fifty-five individuals were identified. Fifty individuals had CCAD, of which 4 had bilateral dissection. In individuals with CCAD, average styloid process length was 27.5mm and styloid process-internal carotid distance was 5.14mm. There was no significant association between styloid process length or styloid process-internal carotid distance, and CCAD when compared with matched controls. Internal carotid artery aberrancy was significant for non-dissection. Conclusions In this study, there was no association between styloid process length and styloid process-internal carotid distance with CCAD. These measurements cannot be used to predict the possibility of a CCAD following trauma.


Cephalalgia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Biousse ◽  
France Woimant ◽  
Pierre Amarenco ◽  
Pierre-Jean Touboul ◽  
Marie-Germaine Bousser

Internal carotid artery dissection is a major cause of ischemic stroke in the young. Pain is the leading symptom and is associated with other focal signs such as Horner's syndrome and painful tinnitus or with signs of cerebral or retinal ischemia. We report two patients with angiographically confirmed extracranial internal carotid artery dissection presenting with cephalic pain as the only manifestation. The first patient had a diffuse headache and a latero-cervical pain lasting for 12 days, reminiscent of carotidynia. The second patient experienced an exploding headache suggestive of subarachnoid hemorrhage, which was ruled out by computed tomography of the head and cerebrospinal fluid study. These patients demonstrate that recognition of carotid artery dissection as a cause of carotidynia and headache suggestive of subarachnoid hemorrhage may permit an earlier diagnosis and possibly the prevention of a stroke through the use of anticoagulation.


Author(s):  
Masahiro Oomura ◽  
Takumi Kitamura ◽  
Kenichi Adachi ◽  
Yusuke Nishikawa ◽  
Mitsuhito Mase

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Geraldes ◽  
P. Batista ◽  
L.M. Pedro ◽  
A. Fernandes ◽  
T.P. Melo

2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (Part 2) ◽  
pp. 489-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis I. Baffour ◽  
Kathryn F. Kirchoff-Torres ◽  
Francine H. Einstein ◽  
Scarlett Karakash ◽  
Todd S. Miller

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (8) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
L.A. Kalashnikova ◽  
M.S. Danilova ◽  
M.V. Gubanova ◽  
M.V. Dreval ◽  
L.A. Dobrynina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document