scholarly journals Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury: 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Aorta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Can Topcu ◽  
Kamile Ozeren-Topcu ◽  
Ahmet Bolukcu ◽  
Sinan Sahin ◽  
Avni U. Seyhan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective In blunt trauma patients, injury of the thoracic aorta is the second most common cause of death after head injury. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has largely replaced open repair as the primary treatment modality, and delayed repair of stable aortic injuries has been shown to improve mortality. In light of these major advancements, we present a 10-year institutional experience from a tertiary cardiovascular surgery center. Methods Records of patients who underwent endovascular or open repair of the ascending, arch or descending thoracic aorta between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients without blunt traumatic etiology were excluded. Perioperative data were retrospectively collected from patient charts. Long-term follow-up was performed via data from follow-up visits and phone calls. Results A total of 1,667 patients underwent 1,740 thoracic aortic procedures (172 TEVAR and 1,568 open repair). There were 13 patients (12 males) with a diagnosis of blunt thoracic aortic injury. Mean patient age was 43.6 years (range, 16–80 years). Ten (77%) patients underwent TEVAR, two (15.4%) underwent open repair, and one (7.7%) was treated nonoperatively. Procedure-related stroke was observed in one (7.7%) case. Procedure-related paraplegia did not occur in any patients. Left subclavian artery origin was covered in seven patients. None developed arm ischemia. Hospital survivors were followed-up for an average of 60.2 months (range, 4–115 months) without any late mortality, endoleak, stent migration, arm ischemia, or reintervention. Conclusion Blunt thoracic aortic injury is a rare but highly fatal condition. TEVAR offers good early and midterm results. Left subclavian artery coverage can be performed without major complications.

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-416
Author(s):  
Hozan Mufty ◽  
Geert Maleux ◽  
Sabrina Houthoofd ◽  
Sandra A Cornelissen ◽  
Kim Daenens ◽  
...  

Objective Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the standard of care for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). Long-term effects of TEVAR on the aortic diameter are not well studied. This study evaluates the effect of TEVAR for BTAI on the aortic diameter in mid- and long-term follow-up. Methods All patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI between August 2000 and May 2016 were included. Maximum aortic diameter was measured at four predetermined thoracic aortic levels in the preoperative and first postoperative CT angiography (CTa) and in the last control CTa or MR angiography: 1 cm proximal (D1) and 1 cm distal to the left subclavian artery (D2), 3 cm distal to the left subclavian artery (D3) and 3 cm proximal to the celiac trunk (D4). Results A total of 27 patients (20 men, mean age 40 years (±17.55) were included. Mean follow-up time was 90 months (±48.36)). No re-interventions were needed. Mean growth of aortic diameter at level D1, D2, D3 and D4 was 0.22 mm ± 3.66, 1.79 mm ± 3.82, 0.73 mm ± 4.18 and –1.06 mm ± 2.82, respectively, when comparing last follow-up to the preoperative imaging without any statistical significant differences. When comparing the preoperative diameter with the first postoperative CT, only a statistical significant growth of 2.81 mm ± 2.69 was seen at level of D2 ( p < 0.05) Conclusion During mid- to long-term follow-up, a temporary significant increase of the maximum aortic diameter was seen at level D2 in the direct postoperative phase This increase was not associated with clinical events and suggests long-term efficacy of TEVAR after BTAI.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. II-84-II-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Borsa ◽  
Eric K. Hoffer ◽  
Ryad Karmy-Jones ◽  
Arthur B. Fontaine ◽  
Robert D. Bloch ◽  
...  

Purpose: To describe the precise anatomical location and extent of injury (based on angiography) in a series of patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and evaluate the findings relative to the potential for endograft repair. Methods: Thoracic aortograms from 50 trauma patients (37 men; mean age 37 years, range 13–87) with BTAI were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters important for endograft repair were recorded, including the length of the pseudoaneurysm, the distance between the origin of the most distal arch vessel and the pseudoaneurysm, the diameter of the aorta both above and below the pseudoaneurysm, and finally, the curvature of the aorta in the vicinity of the pseudoaneurysm. Results: The mean distance from the left subclavian artery to the superior aspect of the injury measured 5.8 mm along the lesser curve and 14.9 mm along the greater curve. The mean length of the injury was 17.0 mm and 26.0 mm along the lesser and greater curves, respectively. The mean aortic diameter adjacent to the injury measured 19.3 mm. The mean degree of curvature of the aorta over the length of the injury was 27.2°, with a mean radius of curvature of 32.6 mm at the superior aspect of the injury and 39.3 mm inferiorly. Conclusions: In most cases of BTAI, the location of the injury will necessitate covering the origin of the left subclavian artery if endovascular repair is to be performed. The curvature of the aorta in the region predisposed to these injuries requires that the endograft be very flexible and/or precurved.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 302.e15-302.e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Harris ◽  
Michael E. Huffner ◽  
Luqman Croal-Abrahams ◽  
Laura DiChiacchio ◽  
Behzad S. Farivar ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 835-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Madigan ◽  
Elizabeth Genovese ◽  
Mikhail Attaar ◽  
Louis Alarcon ◽  
Michael Singh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Erben ◽  
Gerardo Trejo ◽  
Adam J. Brownstein ◽  
Raymond A. Jean ◽  
Bulat A. Ziganshin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document