Mean-variance portfolio rebalancing with transaction costs and funding changes

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Glen
2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Kirby ◽  
Barbara Ostdiek

AbstractDeMiguel, Garlappi, and Uppal (2009) report that naïve diversification dominates mean-variance optimization in out-of-sample asset allocation tests. Our analysis suggests that this is largely due to their research design, which focuses on portfolios that are subject to high estimation risk and extreme turnover. We find that mean-variance optimization often outperforms naïve diversification, but turnover can erode its advantage in the presence of transaction costs. To address this issue, we develop 2 new methods of mean-variance portfolio selection (volatility timing and reward-to-risk timing) that deliver portfolios characterized by low turnover. These timing strategies outperform naïve diversification even in the presence of high transaction costs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
José Euclides De Melo Ferraz ◽  
Christian Johannes Zimmer

In this article we propose a new way to include transaction costs into a mean-variance portfolio optimization. We consider brokerage fees, bid/ask spread and the market impact of the trade. A pragmatic algorithm is proposed, which approximates the optimal portfolio, and we can show that is converges in the absence of restrictions. Using Brazilian financial market data we compare our approximation algorithm with the results of a non-linear optimizer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document