scholarly journals The Optimization of the Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Nonsmooth Concave Transaction Costs

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan YANG ◽  
Peng ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Concave Transaction Costs ◽  
Mean Variance

scholarly journals ON TIME CONSISTENCY FOR MEAN-VARIANCE PORTFOLIO SELECTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 2050042 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELENA VIGNA
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Optimal Strategy ◽  
Time Consistency ◽  
Time Inconsistency ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Optimal Approach ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Mean Variance

This paper addresses a comparison between different approaches to time inconsistency for the mean-variance portfolio selection problem. We define a suitable intertemporal preferences-driven reward and use it to compare three common approaches to time inconsistency for the mean-variance portfolio selection problem over [Formula: see text]: precommitment approach, consistent planning or game theoretical approach, and dynamically optimal approach. We prove that, while the precommitment strategy beats the other two strategies (that is a well-known obvious result), the consistent planning strategy dominates the dynamically optimal strategy until a time point [Formula: see text] and is dominated by the dynamically optimal strategy from [Formula: see text] onwards. Existence and uniqueness of the break even point [Formula: see text] is proven.

scholarly journals Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Tracking Error Penalization

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1915
Author(s):  
William Lefebvre ◽  
Grégoire Loeper ◽  
Huyên Pham
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Tracking Error ◽  
Efficient Frontier ◽  
Minimum Variance ◽  
Sharpe Ratio ◽  
Portfolio Strategy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Mean Variance ◽  
Variance Criterion

This paper studies a variation of the continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection where a tracking-error penalization is added to the mean-variance criterion. The tracking error term penalizes the distance between the allocation controls and a reference portfolio with same wealth and fixed weights. Such consideration is motivated as follows: (i) On the one hand, it is a way to robustify the mean-variance allocation in the case of misspecified parameters, by “fitting" it to a reference portfolio that can be agnostic to market parameters; (ii) On the other hand, it is a procedure to track a benchmark and improve the Sharpe ratio of the resulting portfolio by considering a mean-variance criterion in the objective function. This problem is formulated as a McKean–Vlasov control problem. We provide explicit solutions for the optimal portfolio strategy and asymptotic expansions of the portfolio strategy and efficient frontier for small values of the tracking error parameter. Finally, we compare the Sharpe ratios obtained by the standard mean-variance allocation and the penalized one for four different reference portfolios: equal-weights, minimum-variance, equal risk contributions and shrinking portfolio. This comparison is done on a simulated misspecified model, and on a backtest performed with historical data. Our results show that in most cases, the penalized portfolio outperforms in terms of Sharpe ratio both the standard mean-variance and the reference portfolio.

scholarly journals SCALED AND STABLE MEAN-VARIANCE-EVAR PORTFOLIO SELECTION STRATEGY WITH PROPORTIONAL TRANSACTION COSTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebenezer Fiifi Emire ATTA MILLS ◽  
Bo YU ◽  
Jie YU
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Estimation Risk ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Returns ◽  
L2 Norm ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Variance

This paper studies a portfolio optimization problem with variance and Entropic Value-at-Risk (evar) as risk measures. As the variance measures the deviation around the expected return, the introduction of evar in the mean-variance framework helps to control the downside risk of portfolio returns. This study utilized the squared l2-norm to alleviate estimation risk problems arising from the mean estimate of random returns. To adequately represent the variance-evar risk measure of the resulting portfolio, this study pursues rescaling by the capital accessible after payment of transaction costs. The results of this paper extend the classical Markowitz model to the case of proportional transaction costs and enhance the efficiency of portfolio selection by alleviating estimation risk and controlling the downside risk of portfolio returns. The model seeks to meet the requirements of regulators and fund managers as it represents a balance between short tails and variance. The practical implications of the findings of this study are that the model when applied, will increase the amount of capital for investment, lower transaction cost and minimize risk associated with the deviation around the expected return at the expense of a small additional risk in short tails.

scholarly journals Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection under the CEV Process

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Hui-qiang Ma
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Continuous Time ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Efficient Frontier ◽  
Optimal Portfolio ◽  
Portfolio Strategy ◽  
Cev Process ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Mean Variance

We consider a continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection model when stock price follows the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) process. The aim of this paper is to derive an optimal portfolio strategy and the efficient frontier. The mean-variance portfolio selection problem is formulated as a linearly constrained convex program problem. By employing the Lagrange multiplier method and stochastic optimal control theory, we obtain the optimal portfolio strategy and mean-variance efficient frontier analytically. The results show that the mean-variance efficient frontier is still a parabola in the mean-variance plane, and the optimal strategies depend not only on the total wealth but also on the stock price. Moreover, some numerical examples are given to analyze the sensitivity of the efficient frontier with respect to the elasticity parameter and to illustrate the results presented in this paper. The numerical results show that the price of risk decreases as the elasticity coefficient increases.

scholarly journals Portfolio Selection with Jumps under Regime Switching

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Markov Chain ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Continuous Time ◽  
Regime Switching ◽  
Jump Processes ◽  
Bank Account ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Portfolio Selection Model ◽  
Mean Variance

We investigate a continuous-time version of the mean-variance portfolio selection model with jumps under regime switching. The portfolio selection is proposed and analyzed for a market consisting of one bank account and multiple stocks. The random regime switching is assumed to be independent of the underlying Brownian motion and jump processes. A Markov chain modulated diffusion formulation is employed to model the problem.

scholarly journals TIME-INCONSISTENT MARKOVIAN CONTROL PROBLEMS UNDER MODEL UNCERTAINTY WITH APPLICATION TO THE MEAN-VARIANCE PORTFOLIO SELECTION

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150003
Author(s):  
TOMASZ R. BIELECKI ◽  
TAO CHEN ◽  
IGOR CIALENCO
Keyword(s):  
Stochastic Control ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Control Problems ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Time Inconsistent ◽  
Mean Variance Portfolio ◽  
Mean Variance

In this paper, we study a class of time-inconsistent terminal Markovian control problems in discrete time subject to model uncertainty. We combine the concept of the sub-game perfect strategies with the adaptive robust stochastic control method to tackle the theoretical aspects of the considered stochastic control problem. Consequently, as an important application of the theoretical results and by applying a machine learning algorithm we solve numerically the mean-variance portfolio selection problem under the model uncertainty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document