DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF KANBANS IN MULTI-ITEM JUST-IN-TIME SYSTEMS

1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
RONALD G. ASKIN ◽  
M. GEORGE MITWASI ◽  
JEFFREY B. GOLDBERG
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Ocaña ◽  
Eitan Zemel
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-509
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Butov ◽  
Maxim A. Volkov ◽  
Viktor N. Golovanov ◽  
Anatoly A. Kovalenko ◽  
Boris M. Kostishko ◽  
...  

Introduction. The article deals with mathematical models of two main classes of processes in stochastic productive systems. For a multistage system, conditions of belonging to a “just-in-time” class or a class with infinite support of the time distribution function for productive operations are determined. Materials and Methods. Descriptions and investigations of models are carried out by trajectory (martingale) methods. For “just-in-time” systems and multistage stochastic productive systems, terms and methods of random walks in a random environment and birth and death processes are used. The results are formulated as descriptions of intensity characteristics of equalizers of point counting processes. Results. Two theorems are given and proved; they justify the proposed classification of the mathematical models of productive systems. The criteria of the belonging of the stochastic productive system to the class “just-in-time” are given. A theorem on the incompatibility of groups of “just-in-time” systems and systems infinite support of the time distribution for operations is proved. Discussion and Conclusion. The results show the feasibility of analyzing stochastic productive systems by martingale methods. The descriptions of terms of intensities of the equalizers time of productive processes admit generalization.


Technovation ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yash P Gupta ◽  
Sunderesh Heragu
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zhaoqiong Qin ◽  
Wen-Chyuan Chiang ◽  
Robert Russell

Quantity commitment chosen by firms in competition has been demonstrated by previous studies to mitigate price competition. This study demonstrates that asymmetric quantity commitment can always arise when one firm (e-tailer) shortens lead times or adopts just-in-time systems to circumvent quantity commitment while another firm (retailer) does not. To study the asymmetric quantity commitment in decentralization, a multi-stage game is analyzed, and backward induction is adopted. The authors find that the retailer always adopts the quantity commitment in the decentralization to achieve a higher profit.


2002 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Boyd ◽  
Larry Kronk ◽  
Russell Skinner

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 30-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Fallon ◽  
J. Browne
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document