A Study of Change Processes in Domestically Violent Men in Group Therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varsha Pandya
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-475
Author(s):  
Erika Lawrence ◽  
Callie Mazurek ◽  
Kathleen W. Reardon

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Stuart ◽  
Jeffrey Meehan ◽  
Todd M. Moore ◽  
Julianne Hellmuth ◽  
Meghan Morean ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 088626051985806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Lishak ◽  
Katreena L. Scott ◽  
Amanda Dyson ◽  
Alexander Milovanov

This study examined whether involvement in general criminal behavior was a useful marker of critical historic, psychological, and cognitive aspects of heterogeneity in domestically violent men. Two subgroups of domestically violent men, those with ( n = 56) and without ( n = 54) a history of criminal involvement, were compared with a group of nonviolent men ( n = 82) on internalizing psychopathology, substance abuse, maltreatment in the family of origin, cognitive and executive functioning, and psychophysiological factors. Results found that domestically violent criminal men scored higher than the other two groups on a number of measures including history of childhood violence exposure, childhood externalizing behavior, and adult internalizing psychopathology. No differences were found on their psychophysiological reactivity and cognitive performance. The domestically violent noncriminal group and the comparison group were largely similar on study variables with the exception of education and substance use. Results suggest that general theories of antisocial behavior may be relevant and helpful for understanding domestically violent and criminally involved batterers, whereas social and family violence theories may be of greater relevance to noncriminally involved batterers. Implications of these results for intervention are considered.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Lawson ◽  
Deborah Weber ◽  
Helen Minnette Beckner ◽  
Lori Robinson ◽  
Neal Marsh ◽  
...  

The current study examined the differences between three types of violent men based on Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart’s (1994) tripartite typology and a group of non-intimate violent men. First, a cluster analysis was conducted on a sample of 91 domestically violent men, resulting in three clusters that approximated the tripartite model for psychopathology as measured by the MMPI-2, that is, non-pathological, borderline/dysphoric, and antisocial. Based on the violence variables (i.e., severity of violence, family-only violence, and exposure to family of origin violence) only severity of violence approximated what would be expected across the three clusters, that is, the less the psychopathology, the less severe the violence. The other two violence variables had approximate frequencies/percentages of occurrence that would be expected for individual typologies with some but not all three typologies. In comparing the three intimate violent typologies to the non-intimate violent group, the non-intimate and non-pathological groups were within normal limits and did not differ significantly on any of the MMPI-2 scales. These non-intimate and non-pathological groups differed significantly from the antisocial and borderline/dysphoric groups on all the scales that defined the psychopathology of these two groups. On the violence variables, the non-intimate groups reported significantly less severe violence than the borderline/dysphoric and antisocial groups.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15-16) ◽  
pp. 2897-2916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoë Chouliara ◽  
Thanos Karatzias ◽  
Angela Gullone ◽  
Sandra Ferguson ◽  
Katie Cosgrove ◽  
...  

Our understanding of therapeutic change processes in group therapy for complex interpersonal trauma has been limited. The present study aimed at addressing this gap by developing a framework of therapeutic change in this field from a survivor and therapist perspective. This is a qualitative study, which utilized semistructured individual interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to identify recurrent themes. A final sample of n = 16 patients and n = 5 facilitators completed the interview. Main change processes identified by survivors were as follows: self versus others, trust versus threat, confrontation versus avoidance, and “patching up” versus true healing. Therapeutic processes identified by therapist facilitators included managing group dynamics, unpredictability and uncertainty, and process versus content. The proposed framework explains therapeutic change in group therapy in relational terms, that is, therapeutic dissonance, the dynamic interaction of self and experience as well as building empathic trusting relations. The importance of managing dissonance to aid personally meaningful recovery was highlighted. These findings have implications for the usefulness of relational and person-centered approaches to clinical practice in the area of interpersonal and complex trauma, especially in the early identification, prevention, and management of dropouts.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 731-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony F. Tasso ◽  
Donalee Brown ◽  
Robert Griffo ◽  
Ketrin Saud Maxwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document