scholarly journals Importance of GNSS data quality assessment with novel control criteria in professional soccer match-play

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Aman Singh Shergill ◽  
Jamie Twist ◽  
Craig Highton
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Match Play ◽  
Soccer Match ◽  
Professional Soccer ◽  
Data Quality Assessment ◽  
Control Criteria ◽  
Gnss Data

Applying Domain Knowledge for Data Quality Assessment in Dermatology

2017 ◽  
pp. 147-156
Author(s):  
Nemanja Igić ◽  
Branko Terzić ◽  
Milan Matić ◽  
Vladimir Ivančević ◽  
Ivan Luković
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Domain Knowledge ◽  
Data Quality Assessment

scholarly journals Evaluation of a staff training programme to reimplement a comprehensive health assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e000353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke A Turcotte ◽  
Jake Tran ◽  
Joshua Moralejo ◽  
Nancy Curtin-Telegdi ◽  
Leslie Eckel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Assessment Framework ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Data Quality Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Health

BackgroundHealth information systems with applications in patient care planning and decision support depend on high-quality data. A postacute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, conducted data quality assessment and focus group interviews to guide the development of a cross-disciplinary training programme to reimplement the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 comprehensive health assessment into the hospital’s clinical workflows.MethodsA hospital-level data quality assessment framework based on time series comparisons against an aggregate of Ontario postacute care hospitals was used to identify areas of concern. Focus groups were used to evaluate assessment practices and the use of health information in care planning and clinical decision support. The data quality assessment and focus groups were repeated to evaluate the effectiveness of the training programme.ResultsInitial data quality assessment and focus group indicated that knowledge, practice and cultural barriers prevented both the collection and use of high-quality clinical data. Following the implementation of the training, there was an improvement in both data quality and the culture surrounding the RAI-MDS 2.0 assessment.ConclusionsIt is important for facilities to evaluate the quality of their health information to ensure that it is suitable for decision-making purposes. This study demonstrates the use of a data quality assessment framework that can be applied for quality improvement planning.

scholarly journals Data Quality: A Negotiator between Paper-based and Digital Records in the Pakistan’s TB Control Program

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Mustafa Ali ◽  
Farah Naureen ◽  
Arif Noor ◽  
Maged Kamel N. Boulos ◽  
Javariya Aamir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Assessment Framework ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Data Quality Assessment ◽  
Quality Issues

Background Increasingly, healthcare organizations are using technology for the efficient management of data. The aim of this study was to compare the data quality of digital records with the quality of the corresponding paper-based records by using data quality assessment framework. Methodology We conducted a desk review of paper-based and digital records over the study duration from April 2016 to July 2016 at six enrolled TB clinics. We input all data fields of the patient treatment (TB01) card into a spreadsheet-based template to undertake a field-to-field comparison of the shared fields between TB01 and digital data. Findings A total of 117 TB01 cards were prepared at six enrolled sites, whereas just 50% of the records (n=59; 59 out of 117 TB01 cards) were digitized. There were 1,239 comparable data fields, out of which 65% (n=803) were correctly matched between paper based and digital records. However, 35% of the data fields (n=436) had anomalies, either in paper-based records or in digital records. 1.9 data quality issues were calculated per digital patient record, whereas it was 2.1 issues per record for paper-based record. Based on the analysis of valid data quality issues, it was found that there were more data quality issues in paper-based records (n=123) than in digital records (n=110). Conclusion There were fewer data quality issues in digital records as compared to the corresponding paper-based records. Greater use of mobile data capture and continued use of the data quality assessment framework can deliver more meaningful information for decision making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document