scholarly journals A-117 Sleep Disruption has a Stronger Influence on Self-reported Neurobehavioral Status than Traumatic Brain Injury in U.S. Military Service Members and Veterans

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-910
Author(s):  
Lange R ◽  
French L ◽  
Bailie J ◽  
Hungerford L ◽  
Lippa S ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To examine the relation between sleep disruption and neurobehavioral outcome following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods Participants were 509 U.S. military service members/veterans divided into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (n = 183; MTBI); complicated mild TBI and moderate–severe TBI (n = 96; STBI); injured controls (n = 138; IC); and non-injured controls (n = 92; NIC). Participants completed a 2-hour neurobehavioral test battery 12 or more months post-injury that included the PTSD Checklist and 13 scales from the TBI-Quality of Life (TBI-QOL). Using the TBI-QOL Sleep Disturbance scale, participants were classified into two ‘Sleep’ subgroups: Poor Sleep (55 T or higher) or Good Sleep (50 T or lower). Results A higher proportion of the MTBI group was classified as having Poor Sleep (79.2%) compared to the IC (64.5%) and STBI (58.3%) groups; and all were higher than the NIC group (40.2%). In each group separately, participants with Poor Sleep had significantly worse scores on all TBI-QOL scales compared to those with Good Sleep (all p’s < .001, d = .68 to d = 1.98). Participants with Poor Sleep consistently had worse TBI-QOL scores regardless of TBI severity or the presence/absence of TBI (all p’s < .05). Additionally, there was a significant interaction between Sleep and PTSD. Both factors combined resulted in worse outcome than either factor alone (p’s < .05). Conclusions Poor Sleep had a very strong influence on self-reported neurobehavioral outcome, and a greater influence on outcome than TBI severity or the presence/absence of TBI. Poor Sleep may be a useful ‘risk factor’ that can be used clinically to identify individuals in need of early intervention.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A57-A57
Author(s):  
C Pattinson ◽  
T Brickell ◽  
J Bailie ◽  
L Hungerford ◽  
S Lippa ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Sleep disturbances are pervasively reported in military service members and veterans, especially following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to examine the association between sleep disturbances and neurobehavioural outcomes in a large group of U.S. military service members and veterans, with and without a history of TBI. Methods Participants were enrolled into the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center/Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, 15-Year Longitudinal TBI study (N = 606). Participants self-reported sleep disturbances (PROMIS 8A) and neurobehavioral symptoms. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with post-hoc comparisons. Four groups were analyzed separately: uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n=218); complicated mild, moderate, severe, or penetrating - combined TBI (CTBI; n=118); injured controls (IC, i.e., orthopedic or soft-tissue injury without TBI; n=162); and non-injured controls (NIC; n=108). Results Participants in the MTBI group reported the highest proportion of moderate-severe sleep disturbances (66.5%) compared to the IC (54.9%), CTBI (47.5%), and NIC groups (34.3%). Participants classified as having Poor Sleep reported significantly worse scores on almost all TBI-QOL scales compared to those classified as having Good Sleep, regardless of TBI severity or even the presence of TBI (ps<.05, Cohen’s ds>.3). Discussion This study demonstrates that sleep disturbances remain a prevalent and debilitating concern in service member and veteran populations. Regardless of group (injured or NIC), sleep disturbances were common and were associated with significantly worse neurobehavioral functioning. When assessing and treating neurobehavioural symptoms, it is important to assess sleep, especially in service member and veteran populations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. E1-E15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas B. Cooper ◽  
Amy O. Bowles ◽  
Jan E. Kennedy ◽  
Glenn Curtiss ◽  
Louis M. French ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1146-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Reid ◽  
Douglas B. Cooper ◽  
Lisa H. Lu ◽  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Jan E. Kennedy

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 909-909
Author(s):  
Lippa S ◽  
Bailie J ◽  
Brickell T ◽  
French L ◽  
Hungerford L ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex. Often following mild TBI, recovery occurs within days or weeks, though this is not always the case. Following more severe TBI, some recover quickly, while many never fully recover. This study examines acute predictors of chronic neurobehavioral symptoms in U.S. military service members (Age: M = 33.9 years, SD = 10.2) without injury (n = 86), or with history of uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 56), complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI (mod-sev TBI; n = 43), or bodily injury (n = 25). Method Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, Alcohol Use Disorder Checklist, Combat Exposure Scale, and TBI Quality of Life and passed symptom validity tests at 0–8 months and ≥ 2 years post-injury. Forward stepwise logistic regression included 26 potential predictors (demographics, injury characteristics, military characteristics, and self-report measures at baseline) of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 Postconcussional Syndrome (PCSy) at follow-up. Results Cognitive Concerns (Exp(B) = .896, p = .001), Sleep (Exp(B) = 1.874, p < .001), Somatosensory Symptoms (Exp(B) = 1.194, p = .012), and mod-sev TBI (Exp(B) = 2.959, p = .045) significantly predicted follow-up PCSy. When baseline NSI symptoms were removed from the model, Cognitive Concerns (Exp(B) = .902, p < .001), Post-traumatic stress (Exp(B) = 1.173, p = .001), and Resilience (Exp(B) = .950, p < .031) significantly predicted PCSy. For all included measures in both models, higher symptoms at baseline predicted increased likelihood of follow-up PCSy. Both models correctly classified 81.3% of participants. Conclusion Findings suggest patients reporting psychological distress and cognitive concerns acutely should be targeted for treatment to mitigate prolonged neurobehavioral symptoms.


Brain Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1244-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Davenport ◽  
James T. Gullickson ◽  
Scott F. Grey ◽  
Shawn Hirsch ◽  
Scott R. Sponheim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document