scholarly journals Virtual element method for second-order elliptic eigenvalue problems

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 2026-2054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gardini ◽  
Giuseppe Vacca
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 2035-2056 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Čertík ◽  
F. Gardini ◽  
G. Manzini ◽  
L. Mascotto ◽  
G. Vacca

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondřej Čertík ◽  
Francesca Gardini ◽  
Gianmarco Manzini ◽  
Giuseppe Vacca

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gardini ◽  
Gianmarco Manzini ◽  
Giuseppe Vacca

We analyse the nonconforming Virtual Element Method (VEM) for the approximation of elliptic eigenvalue problems. The nonconforming VEM allows to treat in the same formulation the two- and three-dimensional case. We present two possible formulations of the discrete problem, derived respectively by the nonstabilized and stabilized approximation of theL2-inner product, and we study the convergence properties of the corresponding discrete eigenvalue problem. The proposed schemes provide a correct approximation of the spectrum, in particular we prove optimal-order error estimates for the eigenfunctions and the usual double order of convergence of the eigenvalues. Finally we show a large set of numerical tests supporting the theoretical results, including a comparison with the conforming Virtual Element choice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (04) ◽  
pp. 729-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Beirão da Veiga ◽  
F. Brezzi ◽  
L. D. Marini ◽  
A. Russo

We consider the discretization of a boundary value problem for a general linear second-order elliptic operator with smooth coefficients using the Virtual Element approach. As in [A. H. Schatz, An observation concerning Ritz–Galerkin methods with indefinite bilinear forms, Math. Comput. 28 (1974) 959–962] the problem is supposed to have a unique solution, but the associated bilinear form is not supposed to be coercive. Contrary to what was previously done for Virtual Element Methods (as for instance in [L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini and A. Russo, Basic principles of virtual element methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 199–214]), we use here, in a systematic way, the [Formula: see text]-projection operators as designed in [B. Ahmad, A. Alsaedi, F. Brezzi, L. D. Marini and A. Russo, Equivalent projectors for virtual element methods, Comput. Math. Appl. 66 (2013) 376–391]. In particular, the present method does not reduce to the original Virtual Element Method of [L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini and A. Russo, Basic principles of virtual element methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 199–214] for simpler problems as the classical Laplace operator (apart from the lowest-order cases). Numerical experiments show the accuracy and the robustness of the method, and they show as well that a simple-minded extension of the method in [L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini and A. Russo, Basic principles of virtual element methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 199–214] to the case of variable coefficients produces, in general, sub-optimal results.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gardini ◽  
Gianmarco Manzini ◽  
Giuseppe Vacca

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (08) ◽  
pp. 1541-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Beirão da Veiga ◽  
F. Brezzi ◽  
L. D. Marini ◽  
A. Russo

We present the essential ingredients in the Virtual Element Method for a simple linear elliptic second-order problem. We emphasize its computer implementation, which will enable interested readers to readily implement the method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document