Concert Life in Eighteenth Century England

1958 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Sadie
Author(s):  
William Weber

This chapter shows how selections from English operas composed between the 1730s and the 1790s—chiefly by Thomas Arne, Charles Dibdin, William Shield, and Stephen Storace—became standard repertory in concerts throughout the nineteenth century. Such pieces were performed at benefit concerts organized by individual musicians and at events given by local ensembles that blended songs with virtuoso pieces and orchestral numbers. Critical commentary on such songs justified their aesthetic legitimacy as groups separate from pieces deemed part of classical music. By 1900, songs by Arne, Storace, and even Dibdin were often sung in recitals along with German lieder and pieces from seventeenth- or eighteenth-century Italy or France. The solidity of this tradition contributed to the revival of the operas themselves from the 1920s, most often Arne’s Artaxerxes (1762). This chapter is paired with Rutger Helmers’s “National and international canons of opera in tsarist Russia.”


Author(s):  
Simon McVeigh

Abstract The paper outlines the genesis and subsequent transformation of the database Calendar of London Concerts 1750–1800, now available as a dataset at https://www.doi.org/10.17026/dans-znv-3c2j. Originally developed during the 1980s, the database was used as a primary research tool in the preparation of articles and a 1993 monograph: the first comprehensive study of London’s flourishing public concert life in the later eighteenth century, which culminated in Haydn’s London visits in 1791–5. The database itself, extending to over 4000 records, was derived from an exhaustive study of London newspapers. Following the obsolescence of the relational database in which the material was initially stored, it has recently been transferred to a spreadsheet in csv format, publicly available with free open access. Issues arising out of the standardisation of concert data are explored, especially regarding the layout of complete concert programmes, and the strengths and limitations of the original design are analysed, within the context of the newly available version.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 71-114
Author(s):  
Alyson McLamore

Musically, London has often stood in the shadow of its European cousins. In early studies of the Classical period, musicological attention was usually concentrated on the leading Viennese composers, with only passing reference to England in so far as it related to the careers of these masters. The situation began to change in the 1950s with Charles Cudworth's and Stanley Sadie's pioneering studies of eighteenth-century England, and in recent years several English towns and cities have been the focus of further research. Investigations into London's burgeoning eighteenth-century musical life have revealed the capital's important role in developing modern performance standards and the evolution of a ‘canonic’ repertory, but most research has been centred around public concerts. Despite this increased scholarly attention, there are many frustrating gaps in our knowledge about these activities, and the dearth of information is even greater for most private concerts. There is, however, rich surviving documentation pertaining to the series conducted for nine successive years by the sons of the Revd Charles Wesley (1707–88), co-founder with his brother John Wesley (1703–91) of Methodism. Until now, scholars have failed to make full use of the Wesley materials, partly because of their scattered locations, but also perhaps from a sense that the concerts stood only on the periphery of London concert life. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the Wesley records—and a comparison between them and what is known about more public concerts—shows that these concerts were not as marginal an enterprise as is sometimes assumed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document