Evaluation of the Core Outcome Measure in Whiplash

Spine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 696-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudy J. Rebbeck ◽  
Kathryn M. Refshauge ◽  
Christopher G. Maher ◽  
Mark Stewart
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari ◽  
Soofia Naghdi ◽  
Zahra Eskandari ◽  
Nasser Salsabili ◽  
Ramin Kordi ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaida Hall ◽  
Mark Mullee

This article argues for more research and audit by group psychotherapists in order to inform clinical practice and to influence resource allocation. Problems encountered in research are described. The need for careful planning is emphasized. The choice of outcome measures is discussed and also the choice of research protocol by symptom questionnaire or by change in use of psychiatric services. An account is given of the CORE outcome measure. Reasons for missing data are given and ways are suggested of analysing incomplete data that can provide useful information, using as an example figures from our outcome study on a slow-open group of 94 patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1358-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Tong ◽  
Benedicte Sautenet ◽  
Emilio D. Poggio ◽  
Krista L. Lentine ◽  
Rainer Oberbauer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii336-iii336
Author(s):  
Andrea Viecelli ◽  
Allison Tong ◽  
Angela Ju ◽  
Bénédicte Sautenet ◽  
Braden Manns ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S562
Author(s):  
Angela Ju ◽  
Michelle A Josephson ◽  
Sheila Jowsey-Gregoire ◽  
Jane Tan ◽  
Quinetta Taylor ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1458-1467
Author(s):  
Manuel Albornoz-Cabello ◽  
José Manuel Pérez-Mármol ◽  
Cristo Jesus Barrios Quinta ◽  
Guillermo A Matarán-Peñarrocha ◽  
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on pain, disability, psychological status and range of motion in patients with neck pain. Design: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: Primary care physiotherapy units. Subjects: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with non-specific mechanical neck pain. This sample was divided into two groups randomly: experimental ( n = 42) versus control group ( n = 42). Interventions: Patients in both groups had a supervised therapeutic exercise programme, with the experimental group having additional interferential current stimulation treatment. Main measures: The main measures used were intensity of neck pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale; the degree of disability according to the Neck Disability Index and the CORE Outcome Measure; anxiety and depression levels according to the Goldberg scale; apprehension as measured by the Personal Psychological Apprehension scale; and the range of motion of the cervical spine. The sample was evaluated at baseline and posttreatment (10 sessions/two weeks). Results: Statistically significant differences between groups at posttreatment were observed for Visual Analogue Scale (2.73 ± 1.24 vs 4.99 ± 1.56), Neck Disability Index scores (10.60 ± 4.77 vs 18.45 ± 9.04), CORE Outcome Measure scores (19.18 ± 9.99 vs 35.12 ± 13.36), Goldberg total score (6.17 ± 4.27 vs 7.90 ± 4.87), Goldberg Anxiety subscale, Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale scores (28.17 ± 9.61 vs 26.29 ± 11.14) and active and passive right rotation. Conclusions: Adding interferential current stimulation to exercise resulted in better immediate outcome across a range of measures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S196
Author(s):  
A. JU ◽  
M. Unruh ◽  
C. Wilkie ◽  
G. Obrador ◽  
D. O'Donoghue ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1199-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Ju ◽  
Michelle A. Josephson ◽  
Zeeshan Butt ◽  
Sheila Jowsey-Gregoire ◽  
Jane Tan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document