A14814 Ownership of home blood pressure devices among patients with hypertension in primary care

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. e172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navin Kumar Devaraj ◽  
Siew Mooi Ching ◽  
Shu Leed Tan ◽  
Siti Nurkamilla Ramzdan ◽  
Yook Chin Chia ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1051-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Martín-Rioboó ◽  
Luis A. Pérula de Torres ◽  
José R. Banegas ◽  
José M. Lobos-Bejarano ◽  
Carlos Brotons Cuixart ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Yajuan Wang ◽  
Hao Gu ◽  
Yuesheng Qain ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
...  

BJGP Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen20X101101
Author(s):  
Jacob A Andrews ◽  
Kate Weiner ◽  
Catherine M Will ◽  
Flis Henwood ◽  
Jon M Dickson

BackgroundHome self-monitoring of blood pressure is widely used in primary care to assist in the diagnosis of hypertension, as well as to improve clinical outcomes and support adherence to medication. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) care pathways for hypertension recommend specific guidelines, although they lack detail on supporting patients to self-monitor.AimTo elicit primary care practitioners’ experiences of managing patients’ home blood pressure self-monitoring, across surgeries located in different socioeconomic areas.Design & settingA qualitative focus group study was conducted with a total of 21 primary care professionals.MethodParticipants were GPs and practice nurses (PNs), purposively recruited from surgeries in areas of low and high deprivation, according to the English indices of multiple deprivation. Six vignettes were developed featuring data from interviews with people who self-monitor and these were used in five focus groups. Results were thematically analysed.ResultsThemes derived in the thematic analysis largely reflected topics covered by the vignettes. These included: advice on purchase of a device; supporting home monitoring; mitigating patient anxiety experienced as a result of home monitoring; valuing patients’ data; and effect of socioeconomic factors.ConclusionThe work provides an account of methods used by primary care practitioners in the management of home blood pressure self-monitoring, where guidance may be lacking and primary care practitioners act on their own judgement. Findings complement recent policy documentation, which recognises the need to adopt new ways of working to empower patients (for example, additional support from healthcare assistants), but lacks detail on how this should be done.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Selcuk Mistik ◽  
Kevser Goktas ◽  
Demet Unalan ◽  
Abdurrahman Oguzhan ◽  
Bulent Tokgöz

Aim: Hypertension is very common in primary care patients. The diagnosis of hypertension is made by office measurements and home blood pressure measurements. The aim of this study was to define the normal variation levels of blood pressure in individuals in primary care by using ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Methods: This study was performed in primary care. Individuals who had no hypertension history were included in the study. Subjects were evaluated by using three office measurements, seven days home blood pressure measurements and 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure measurement. The ambulatory blood pressure gave us the variations in blood pressure values. Results: The study started in January 2018 and ended in May 2018. Of the 47 subjects, 70.2% were women and 29.8% were men. The mean age was 41.63±12.00. The most common educational level was elementary school graduates. The most common occupation was housewives. Of the participants, 84.2% were married. At ambulatory blood pressure measurements, 34.0% of the subjects had mean systolic blood pressures 24 hours between 120-129 mmHg. Of the diastolic blood pressure 24 hours mean values, 15.3% had values between 80-89, where 51.0% were between the 71-79 mmHg groups. The mean value of 24 hours variation in systolic blood pressure was 15.75±18.59 (median=11.40, min=8.80, max=106.00). The 24 hours variation in the mean values of diastolic blood pressures was 12.12±10.90 (median=9.70, min=6.80, max=64.00). Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that there were high levels of variations in normal blood pressures, which could show candidates for hypertension. Keywords: ambulatory monitoring, blood pressure, variability, primary care


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document