Bilateral Activation of Motor Unit Potentials with Unilateral Needle Stimulation of Active Myofascial Trigger Points

Author(s):  
Joseph F. Audette ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Howard Smith
2008 ◽  
Vol 187 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-You Ge ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Shellie Boudreau ◽  
Shou-Wei Yue ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen

Pain ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Z. Srbely ◽  
James P. Dickey ◽  
Mark Lowerison ◽  
Michelle A. Edwards ◽  
Paul S. Nolet ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-You Ge ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen ◽  
Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Evans ◽  
Michael Behr ◽  
Kei Masani ◽  
Dinesh Kumbhare

Abstract Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a prevalent chronic pain disorder primarily characterized by myofascial trigger points (MTrP). There is limited knowledge on the pathophysiology and mechanisms underlying MTrP and its development. Research has previously demonstrated the identification of MTrPs using ultrasound and vibration sonoelastography, although there is some contradictory evidence regarding if MTrPs present as hyper or hypoechoic regions. Electromyography (EMG) investigations of MTrP have demonstrated that MTrP are usually located proximal to innervation zones where the peak surface EMG signals are obtained from. Central sensitization has been proposed as the primary mechanism underlying MTrP development. Central sensitization is associated with hyperexcitability of neuronal responses to normal or noxious stimuli. There is a need for a study that measures ultrasound image textural changes and motor unit activity responses in the muscle following sensitization. The purpose of this study is to determine whether sensitizing healthy muscle using capsaicin induces a regional change in image texture variables within the specific and surrounding muscles, as well as the motor unit frequency and amplitude changes that accompany them.This is an exploratory trial that aims to provide preliminary evidence on whether central sensitization is a direct cause of taut band and MTrP development. Methods: The study conforms to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials recommendations. Ethical approval will be sought from the University Health Network (UHN) Research Ethics Board. This proposed study is a single centered, factorial, randomized placebo-controlled trial with two independent variables, depth of capsaicin application and dose of capsaicin, for a total of four treatment arms and two control treatment groups. Discussion: This will be the first study that assesses the B-mode ultrasound image texture of induced sensitized muscles, and will provide more evidence on muscle motor unit activity and regional changes of central sensitization. Findings from this study may support one of few hypotheses proposed delineating the involvement of central sensitization in the development of trigger points.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-You Ge ◽  
Mariano Serrao ◽  
Ole K Andersen ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen

Background Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) present with mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia. No electrophysiological evidence exists as to the excitability of muscle spindle afferents at myofascial trigger points MTrPs. The purpose of this current study was to explore whether an H-reflex response could be elicited from intramuscular electrical stimulation. If so, to assess the possibility of increased reflex response at MTrPs. Methods The H-reflex latency and the conduction velocity were first determined from electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve in 13 healthy subjects. Then an intramuscular monopolar needle electrode was inserted randomly into a latent MTrP or a non-MTrP in the gastrocnemius muscle. Electrical stimuli at different intensities were delivered via the intramuscular recording electrode to the MTrP or non-MTrP. Results The average conduction velocity (44.3 ± 1.5 m/s) of the electrical stimulation of tibial nerve was similar (p>0.05) with the conduction velocity (43.9 ± 1.4 m/s) of intramuscular electrical stimulation. The intramuscular H-reflex at MTrPs was higher in amplitude than non-MTrPs (p<0.001). The reflex threshold was lower for MTrPs than non-MTrPs (p<0.001). Conclusion The current study provides first electrophysiological evidence that intramuscular electrical stimulation can evoke H-reflex, and that higher H-reflex amplitude and lower H-reflex threshold exist at MTrPs than non-MTrPs respectively, suggesting that muscle spindle afferents may be involved in the pathophysiology of MTrPs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document