Factors determining loss of reduction in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Venkatadass ◽  
Manas Maji ◽  
G. Sangeet ◽  
K. Raghavendra ◽  
S. Rajasekaran
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Rojan Tamrakar ◽  
Ramod Khanal ◽  
Balakrishnan M. Acharya ◽  
Nabees Man Singh Pradhan ◽  
Suman Kumar Shrestha

Introductions: Cross or two lateral pinnings are the most commonly done procedures for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A crossed pin is biomechanically stable than lateral pins, but associated with risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Recent studies have shown stable fixation with three lateral pin construct. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of three lateral divergent pinning for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures.Methods: Thirty five children with Gartland types III were treated between November 2012 and November 2013. Closed reduction and three lateral divergent pinning was done with image intensifier guidance. Patients were followed up for minimum 6 months. Radiological assessment was done to see union, proper pin placement and loss of reduction. Clinically, patients were assessed by using Flynn criteria.Results: There were 24 (68.6%) male and 11 (31.4%) female children between 2 to 13 years of age with displaced supracondylar fractures, left side 26 (74.3%) and right nine (25.7%) cases. All were successfully managed with closed reduction and three lateral divergent pins within 2-6 days of injury. One radial and one median nerve palsies sustained at injury recovered spontaneously. No iatrogenic nerve injuries occurred. A comparison of perioperative and final radiographs revealed no loss of reduction. Twenty-seven excellent, five good, two fair and one poor results on Flynn’s grading. One patient had a superficial pin-tract infection.Conclusions: Closed reduction with three lateral divergent pins is safe for stable fixation of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children.


2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinisa Ducic ◽  
Marko Bumbasirevic ◽  
Vladimir Radlovic ◽  
Petar Nikic ◽  
Zoran Bukumiric ◽  
...  

Introduction. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are the most widely used treatment options for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children, but there is still no consensus concerning the most preferred technique in injuries of the extension type. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare three common orthopaedic procedures in the treatment of displaced extension type supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Methods. Total of 93 consecutive patients (66 boys and 27 girls) referred to our hospital with Gartland type II or III extension supracondylar humeral fractures were prospectively included in the study over a six-year period. At initial presentation 48 patients were classified as Gartland type II and 45 as Gartland type III fractures. The patients were subdivided into three groups based on the following treatment modality: closed reduction with percutaneous pinning, open reduction with Kirschner wires (K-wires) fixation, and closed reduction with cast immobilisation. The treatment outcome and clinical characteristics were compared among groups, as well as evaluated using Flynn?s criteria. Results. Excellent clinical outcome was reported in 70.3% of patients treated with closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and in 64.7% of patients treated with open reduction with K-wire fixation. The outcome was significantly worse in children treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation alone, as excellent outcome is achieved in just 36.4% of cases (p=0.011). Conclusion. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning is the method of choice in the treatment of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture, while open reduction with K-wire fixation is as a good alternative in cases with clear indications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document