Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for Posterior Shoulder Instability in Patients 18 Years Old or Younger

Objectives: Diagnosis of and treatment for posterior shoulder instability (PSI) has improved with advances in surgical technique and radiographic imaging. It is unknown if PSI, or surgical measures to correct PSI, affect the progression of osteoarthritis in the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of posterior capsulolabral reconstruction (PCLR) and demographic risk factors on the rate of radiographic progression of osteoarthritis in shoulders with PSI. Methods: The study population included 115 patients (14 females, 101 males) diagnosed with PSI between January 1994 and July 2012 with an average follow up of 12.5years (range 5-23). Medical records were reviewed to evaluate patient demographics, surgical intervention, and radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. Kaplan Meier survival was used to estimate survival and Cox models were used to examine associations with osteoarthritis progression. Results: Overall, 16/115 (14%) patients had radiographic progression of glenohumeral arthritis with 5-year survival at 88.3% (95% CI 79.7%-97.3%). Age ≥30 at the time of instability was associated with arthritis progression (p<0.05). The number of previous dislocations, sport, and gender each did not affect progression (p>0.05). PCLR with at least one anchor along the posterior glenoid rim was performed in 56/115 (48%) of patients. There was no difference in the rate of radiographic arthritic progression in those who underwent PCLR and those who did not (7/56, 13% vs 10/59, 17%, p>0.05). One male patient who underwent PCLR progressed to end-stage arthritis, necessitating a shoulder arthroplasty at age 53. Conclusion: Radiographic progression of glenohumeral arthritis occurred 14% of patients with PSI. Age ≥30 at the time of initial instability was associated with radiographic progression of glenohumeral arthritis.

Download Full-text

Posterior capsulolabral reconstruction in posterior shoulder instability: Deltoid saving

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery ◽

10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.014 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. 355-360 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Yong Girl Rhee ◽

Dong Hun Lee ◽

Chan Teak Lim

Keyword(s):

Shoulder Instability ◽

Posterior Shoulder Instability ◽

Posterior Shoulder ◽

Capsulolabral Reconstruction

Download Full-text

Differences in Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Shoulder Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/23259671211006437 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 232596712110064

Author(s):

Matthew L. Vopat ◽

Reed G. Coda ◽

Nick E. Giusti ◽

Jordan Baker ◽

Armin Tarakemeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Shoulder Instability ◽

Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽

Posterior Shoulder Instability ◽

Anterior Instability ◽

Posterior Instability ◽

Female Patients ◽

Posterior Shoulder ◽

Male Patients ◽

Postoperative Instability

Background: The glenohumeral joint is one of the most frequently dislocated joints in the body, particularly in young, active adults. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare outcomes between anterior versus posterior shoulder instability. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases (from inception to September 2019) according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they were published in the English language, contained outcomes after anterior or posterior shoulder instability, had at least 1 year of follow-up, and included arthroscopic soft tissue labral repair of either anterior or posterior instability. Outcomes including return-to-sport (RTS) rate, postoperative instability rate, and pre- and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were recorded and analyzed. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included (2077 patients; 1716 male patients and 361 female patients). Patients with anterior instability had a mean age of 23.45 ± 5.40 years (range, 11-72 years), while patients with posterior instability had a mean age of 23.08 ± 8.41 years (range, 13-61 years). The percentage of male patients with anterior instability was significantly higher than that of female patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77; P = .021). Compared with patients with posterior instability, those with anterior instability were significantly more likely to RTS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.76-3.04; P < .001), and they were significantly more likely to have postoperative instability (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.23; P = .018). Patients with anterior instability also had significantly higher ASES scores than those with posterior instability (difference in means, 6.74; 95% CI, 4.71-8.77; P < .001). There were no significant differences found in postoperative complications between the anterior group (11 complications; 1.8%) and the posterior group (3 complications; 1.6%) (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.29-6.30; P = .999). Conclusion: Patients with anterior shoulder instability had higher RTS rates but were more likely to have postoperative instability compared with posterior instability patients. Overall, male patients were significantly more likely to have anterior shoulder instability, while female patients were significantly more likely to have posterior shoulder instability.

Download Full-text