Deployment of the Water Drinking Test and iCare HOME Phasing for Intraocular Pressure Profiling in Glaucoma Evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Phu ◽  
Katherine Masselos ◽  
Michael Kalloniatis
Clinics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 967-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Lacerda Furlanetto ◽  
Antonio Carlos Facio Jr ◽  
Marcelo Hatanaka ◽  
Remo Susanna Junior

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Tran ◽  
Nuwan Niyadurupola ◽  
Jeremy O'Connor ◽  
Ghee Soon Ang ◽  
Jonathan Crowston ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 394
Author(s):  
Farideh Sharifipour ◽  
Mohammad Malekahmadi ◽  
Mehdi Azimi ◽  
Bahman Cheraghian

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1675-1680
Author(s):  
Jin Rong Low ◽  
Chee Wai Wong ◽  
Jing Liang Loo ◽  
Dan Milea ◽  
Shamira A Perera ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 950-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina N. Susanna ◽  
Remo Susanna ◽  
Marcelo Hatanaka ◽  
Bianca N. Susanna ◽  
Fernanda N. Susanna ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212091133
Author(s):  
Izabela Almeida ◽  
Ana Luiza B Scoralick ◽  
Diego T Dias ◽  
Michele Ushida ◽  
Syril Dorairaj ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare provocative test-based and long-term intraocular pressure variation parameters in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in which stable open-angle glaucoma patients (⩾3 years of follow-up without any changes on current medical regimen) were consecutively enrolled. All patients were submitted to a water-drinking test. Long-term intraocular pressure parameters were obtained from isolated intraocular pressure measurements from each visit (⩾5 visits). We investigated the correlation and agreement between the following water-drinking test and long-term intraocular pressure parameters: mean, peak, and fluctuation. In addition, the percentage of eyes with significant intraocular pressure peaks during the water-drinking test (defined as a difference ⩾25% between water-drinking test intraocular pressure peak and mean long-term intraocular pressure) was assessed. Results: Sixty-three eyes from 63 open-angle glaucoma patients (mean age, 60.7 ± 11.8 years) were included. Mean and water-drinking test intraocular pressure peak correlated significantly with mean ( r = 0.67) and maximum long-term intraocular pressure ( r = 0.52), respectively ( p < 0.01). The correlation between water-drinking test intraocular pressure fluctuation and long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation was not significant ( p = 0.45). Limits of agreement from Bland–Altman plots exceeded the maximum allowed difference between methods (3 mm Hg) for all the intraocular pressure parameters analyzed, suggesting poor agreement between water-drinking test–derived and long-term intraocular pressure values. Overall, significant water-drinking test intraocular pressure peaks were observed in 39.7% of these eyes with stable open-angle glaucoma. Conclusion: Although some water-drinking test–based and long-term intraocular pressure parameters correlate significantly, water-drinking test results may not reflect the long-term intraocular pressure profile of stable open-angle glaucoma patients, as their agreement is poor. Many of these patients may experience significant water-drinking test intraocular pressure peaks, despite long-standing stable disease and unchanged medical regimen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document