A Simple Combination Approach for Costal Cartilage Augmentation Rhinoplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-342
Author(s):  
Congzhen Qiao ◽  
Wenxin Yu ◽  
Wei Gao ◽  
Yajing Qiu ◽  
Xiaoxi Lin
2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-228
Author(s):  
Il Kang Kim ◽  
Kyung Min Choi ◽  
Jae Ho Kang ◽  
Jang Hee Han ◽  
Choon Dong Kim

1990 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 539-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Spencer

AbstractA challenging surgical problem is the correction of supra-tip depression of the nose following collapse of nasal septal support. Numerous materials have been used in augmentation rhinoplasties attempting to correct this deformity, all having certain disadvantages. A modified technique is described in which costal cartilage surrounded by perichondrium is grafted in such noses; the results of a small series is discussed. The problems of graft distortion and resorbtion appear to have been satisfactorily overcome by using this procedure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 128 (19) ◽  
pp. 2679-2681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Guang Ma ◽  
Ke-Ming Wang ◽  
Xiao-Hui Zhao ◽  
Lei Cai ◽  
Xin Li

2006 ◽  
Vol 135 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P215-P216
Author(s):  
Chuan-Hsiang Kao ◽  
Chung-Ching Hung ◽  
Hsing-Won Wang

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 865-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard R Parresol

Two procedures that guarantee the property of additivity among the components of tree biomass and total tree biomass utilizing nonlinear functions are developed. Procedure 1 is a simple combination approach, and procedure 2 is based on nonlinear joint-generalized regression (nonlinear seemingly unrelated regressions) with parameter restrictions. Statistical theory is given for construction of confidence and prediction intervals for the two procedures. Specific examples using slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) biomass data are presented to demonstrate and clarify the methods behind nonlinear estimation, additivity, error modeling, and the formation of confidence and prediction intervals. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence indicate procedure 2 is generally superior to procedure 1. It is argued that modeling the error structure is preferable to using the logarithmic transformation to deal with the problem of heteroscedasticity. The techniques given are applicable to any quantity that can be disaggregated into logical components.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Weber ◽  
Ted A. Cook ◽  
Tom D. Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document