scholarly journals Precision measurement of the 1Sground-state Lamb shift in atomic hydrogen and deuterium by frequency comparison

1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 2664-2681 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Weitz ◽  
A. Huber ◽  
F. Schmidt-Kaler ◽  
D. Leibfried ◽  
W. Vassen ◽  
...  
1967 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley J. Brodsky ◽  
Ronald G. Parsons

1984 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. L115-L120 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kallne ◽  
J Kallne ◽  
P Richard ◽  
M Stockli

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Weitz ◽  
A. Huber ◽  
F. Schmidt-Kaler ◽  
D. Leibfried ◽  
T. W. Hänsch

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 365 (6457) ◽  
pp. 1007-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bezginov ◽  
T. Valdez ◽  
M. Horbatsch ◽  
A. Marsman ◽  
A. C. Vutha ◽  
...  

The surprising discrepancy between results from different methods for measuring the proton charge radius is referred to as the proton radius puzzle. In particular, measurements using electrons seem to lead to a different radius compared with those using muons. Here, a direct measurement of the n = 2 Lamb shift of atomic hydrogen is presented. Our measurement determines the proton radius to be rp = 0.833 femtometers, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 femtometers. This electron-based measurement of rp agrees with that obtained from the analogous muon-based Lamb shift measurement but is not consistent with the larger radius that was obtained from the averaging of previous electron-based measurements.


1972 ◽  
Vol 235 (56) ◽  
pp. 63-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. HÄNSCH ◽  
I. S. SHAHIN ◽  
A. L. SCHAWLOW

2022 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ohayon ◽  
G. Janka ◽  
I. Cortinovis ◽  
Z. Burkley ◽  
L. de Sousa Borges ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 176 (1) ◽  
pp. 423-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley J. Brodsky ◽  
Ronald G. Parsons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document