Comparison of theNm16(0−)β-Decay Rate with the Inverse Muon-Capture Rate: The Induced Pseudoscalar Form Factor in Nuclei

1975 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Palffy ◽  
J. P. Deutsch ◽  
L. Grenacs ◽  
J. Lehmann ◽  
M. Steels
2001 ◽  
Vol 686 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 290-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Bernard ◽  
Thomas R Hemmert ◽  
Ulf-G Meißner

1986 ◽  
Vol 323 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Y. Kuno ◽  
J. Imazato ◽  
K. Nishiyama ◽  
K. Nagamine ◽  
T. Yamazaki ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Graves ◽  
B. A. Lamers ◽  
Anton Nagl ◽  
H. Überall ◽  
V. Devanathan ◽  
...  

The available experimental data for the form factors of the T = 1 levels in 16O, obtained from electron scattering at low (Darmstadt), medium (Tohoku), and high momentum transfer (Stanford), are interpreted by the generalized Helm model. This phenomenological model reduces the form factor description of each level to the listing of a few physical parameters, i.e., the radius and smearing width of the transition densities of charge (current) and magnetization, and their corresponding strength constants. Its parameters having been determined by the form factor fits, the model may then be used to predict the results of other medium energy processes; this is done here for the photoproduction of charged pions and for muon capture in16O.


1970 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Delorme ◽  
M. Ericson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document