A Multi-modal Ride Sharing Framework for Last Mile Connectivity

Author(s):  
Manish Chaturvedi ◽  
Sanjay Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Agussurja ◽  
Shih-Fen Cheng ◽  
Hoong Chuin Lau

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1466-1497
Author(s):  
Junyu Cao ◽  
Mariana Olvera-Cravioto ◽  
Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen

We propose a model for optimizing the last-mile delivery of n packages from a distribution center to their final recipients, using a strategy that combines the use of ride-sharing platforms (e.g., Uber or Lyft) with traditional in-house van delivery systems. The main objective is to compute the optimal reward offered to private drivers for each of the n packages such that the total expected cost of delivering all packages is minimized. Our technical approach is based on the formulation of a discrete sequential packing problem, in which bundles of packages are picked up from the warehouse at random times during the interval [Formula: see text]. Our theoretical results include both exact and asymptotic (as [Formula: see text]) expressions for the expected number of packages that are picked up by time T. They are closely related to the classical Rényi’s parking/packing problem. Our proposed framework is scalable with the number of packages.


Author(s):  
Yantao Huang ◽  
Kara M. Kockelman ◽  
Venu Garikapati ◽  
Lei Zhu ◽  
Stanley Young

Shared fleets of fully automated vehicles (SAVs) coupled with real-time ride-sharing to and from transit stations are of interest to cities and nations in delivering more sustainable transportation systems. By providing first-mile last-mile (FMLM) connections to key transit stations, SAVs can replace walk-to-transit, drive-to-transit, and drive-only trips. Using the SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility) toolkit, this paper examines mode splits, wait times, and other system features by micro-simulating two fleets of SAVs providing an FMLM ride-sharing service to 10% of central Austin’s trip-makers near five light-rail transit stations. These trips either start or end within two geofenced areas (called automated mobility districts [AMDs]), and travel time and wait time feedbacks affect mode choices. With rail service headways of 15 min, and 15 SAVs serving FMLM connections to and from each AMD, simulations predict that 3.7% of the person-trip-making will shift from driving alone to transit use in a 3 mi × 6 mi central Austin area. During a 3-h morning peak, 30 SAVs serve about 10 person-trips each (to or from the stations), with 3.4 min average wait time for SAVs, and an average vehicle occupancy of 0.74 persons (per SAV mile-traveled), as a result of empty SAV driving between riders. Sensitivity analysis of transit headways (from 5 to 20 min) and fleet sizes (from 5 to 20 vehicles in each AMD) shows an increase in FMLM mode share with more frequent transit service and larger fleet size, but total travel time served as the biggest determinant in trip-makers’ mode share.


10.1596/30457 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephane Hallegatte ◽  
Jun Rentschler
Keyword(s):  

10.1596/29544 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Tinsley ◽  
Natalia Agapitova
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zhiwei (Tony) Qin ◽  
Xiaocheng Tang ◽  
Yan Jiao ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Chenxi Wang ◽  
...  

In this demo, we will present a simulation-based human-computer interaction of deep reinforcement learning in action on order dispatching and driver repositioning for ride-sharing.  Specifically, we will demonstrate through several specially designed domains how we use deep reinforcement learning to train agents (drivers) to have longer optimization horizon and to cooperate to achieve higher objective values collectively. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document