scholarly journals A comparison of koniocellular, magnocellular and parvocellular receptive field properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the owl monkey ( Aotus trivirgatus )

2001 ◽  
Vol 531 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangmin Xu ◽  
Jennifer M. Ichida ◽  
John D. Allison ◽  
Jamie D. Boyd ◽  
A. B. Bonds ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 594-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence P. O'Keefe ◽  
Jonathan B. Levitt ◽  
Daniel C. Kiper ◽  
Robert M. Shapley ◽  
J. Anthony Movshon

O'Keefe, Lawrence P., Jonathan B. Levitt, Daniel C. Kiper, Robert M. Shapley, and J. Anthony Movshon. Functional organization of owl monkey lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 594–609, 1998. The nocturnal, New World owl monkey ( Aotus trivirgatus) has a rod-dominated retina containing only a single cone type, supporting only the most rudimentary color vision. However, it does have well-developed magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) retinostriate pathways and striate cortical architecture [as defined by the pattern of staining for the activity-dependent marker cytochrome oxidase (CO)] similar to that seen in diurnal primates. We recorded from single neurons in anesthetized, paralyzed owl monkeys using drifting, luminance-modulated sinusoidal gratings, comparing receptive field properties of M and P neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus and in V1 neurons assigned to CO “blob,” “edge,” and “interblob” regions and across layers. Tested with achromatic stimuli, the receptive field properties of M and P neurons resembled those reported for other primates. The contrast sensitivity of P cells in the owl monkey was similar to that of P cells in the macaque, but the contrast sensitivities of M cells in the owl monkey were markedly lower than those in the macaque. We found no differences in eye dominance, orientation, or spatial frequency tuning, temporal frequency tuning, or contrast response for V1 neurons assigned to different CO compartments; we did find fewer direction-selective cells in blobs than in other compartments. We noticed laminar differences in some receptive field properties. Cells in the supragranular layers preferred higher spatial and lower temporal frequencies and had lower contrast sensitivity than did cells in the granular and infragranular layers. Our data suggest that the receptive field properties across functional compartments in V1 are quite homogeneous, inconsistent with the notion that CO blobs anatomically segregate signals from different functional “streams.”


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (28) ◽  
pp. 11494-11505 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Van Hooser ◽  
A. Roy ◽  
H. J. Rhodes ◽  
J. H. Culp ◽  
D. Fitzpatrick

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Mastronarde

Cells in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were studied by presentation of visual stimuli and also by simultaneous recording of their ganglion cell inputs in the retina. This paper describes receptive-field properties and a new system of classification for LGN X-cells that appear to receive essentially only one excitatory retinal input. These X-cells were of two distinct classes. The visual responses of one class of cell (XS, single) replicated the basic form of the responses of a retinal X-cell. The other class of cell (XL, lagged) had responses with two remarkable features: their firing lagged 40-80 ms behind that of XS-cells or ganglion cells at response onset, and they fired anomalously at times when XS-cells or ganglion cells would not be firing. Thus, for a flashing spot, XL-cells were inhibited from firing after stimulus onset, during the time when XS-cells or retinal X-cells had an initial transient peak in firing; XL-cells generally had an anomalous peak in firing after stimulus offset, after XS-cells or retinal X-cells had stopped firing. For a moving bar, XS-cells or retinal X-cells responded primarily while the bar was in the receptive-field center, whereas most of a typical XL-cell's response occurred after the bar had left the receptive-field center. The latencies of various features in the visual responses were analyzed. For several visual response latencies, the distribution was clearly bimodal, thus objectively demonstrating the existence of two cell classes. Using only the latencies from spot and bar responses, over 90% of these single-input cells could be reliably identified as belonging to one of the two classes. The remaining cells (7 of 128) were intermediate between the two classes in some but not all respects; because they had some properties in common, these cells were kept in a separate group (XPL, partially lagged). The axons of both XS- and XL-cells could be antidromically activated from visual cortex. Cortical latencies were typically 0.7-2.0 ms for XS-cells but much longer, typically 2.4-5.0 ms, for XL-cells. It is possible that XL-cells have not previously been recognized as a separate class because cells with such long latencies have been recorded infrequently in the past. Responses to central flashing spots were more transient than those of retinal X-cells for most XS-cells and more sustained for most XL-cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (48) ◽  
pp. 10384-10398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin D. Eiber ◽  
Abrar S. Rahman ◽  
Alexander N.J. Pietersen ◽  
Natalie Zeater ◽  
Bogdan Dreher ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document