Chapter 2. Chebyshev Points and Interpolants

Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 19-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reznikov ◽  
E. Saff ◽  
A. Volberg

1998 ◽  
Vol 283 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 205-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Eisinberg ◽  
G. Franzé ◽  
P. Pugliese

1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (187) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Fischer ◽  
Lothar Reichel

2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 3410-3413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao Feng Xie ◽  
Peng Fei Zhang ◽  
Li Long Liu

Using Chebyshev polynomial to fit precise ephemeris of GPS, the nodes selection has a certain influence on the precision. In this paper we use 3 kinds of precise ephemeris ( IGF, IGR, IGU ) to analyze the difference precision of randomly selected interpolation node and Chebyshev points fitting orbit and compare the difference and precision of fitting orbit by 3 kinds of ephemeris and orbit provided by IGS. The result shows that using Chebyshev points to fit precise ephemeris, the precision of IGF and IGR can achieve mm levels, the precision of IGU can achieve cm levels.


1999 ◽  
Vol 68 (227) ◽  
pp. 1109-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Baltensperger ◽  
Jean-Paul Berrut ◽  
Benjamin Noël

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 1713-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pachón ◽  
Pedro Gonnet ◽  
Joris van Deun

1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (187) ◽  
pp. 265-265
Author(s):  
Bernd Fischer ◽  
Lothar Reichel

1973 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-390
Author(s):  
R.D. Riess

Berman has raised the question in his work of whether Hermite-Fejér interpolation based on the so-called “practical” Chebyshev points, , 0(1)n, is uniformly convergent for all continuous functions on the interval [−1, 1]. In spite of similar negative results by Berman and Szegö, this paper shows this result is true, which is in accord with the great similarities of Lagrangian interpolation based on these points versus the points , 1(1)n.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document