An Open-Label, Randomized, Flexible-Dose, Crossover Study to Assess the Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil Citrate and Apomorphine Hydrochloride in Men with Erectile Dysfunction

2008 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Giammusso ◽  
Giovanni M. Colpi ◽  
Luigi Cormio ◽  
Giuseppe Ludovico ◽  
Marcello Soli ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Eardley ◽  
Robert Morgan ◽  
Wallace Dinsmore ◽  
Paula Yates ◽  
Mitradev Boolell

BackgroundErectile dysfunction is a common, multi-factorial disorder.AimsTo evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and frequency of use of sildenafil citrate in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction of no established organic cause.MethodThis double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, two-way crossover study was conducted at four centres in the UK in 44 men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction of no clinically obvious organic cause. The study included two 28-day treatment periods, during which time sildenafil or placebo (25–75 mg, based on efficacy) was taken as required.ResultsCompared with placebo, sildenafil was associated with increases in frequency of use, erections adequate for sexual intercourse and level of sexual satisfaction (P < 0.0001). More patients receiving sildenafil stated they would use the treatment again compared with those receiving placebo (P < 0.0001). There were no discontinuations due to sildenafil treatment.ConclusionsSildenafil is effective and well tolerated in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction of no clinically identifiable organic cause.


2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fusco ◽  
A. Lembo ◽  
G.M. Ludovico ◽  
F. Pirozzi Farina ◽  
F. Montorsi ◽  
...  

This is an open, multicentre, randomized, crossover study having the aim to evaluate the preference for sildenafil citrate or tadalafil in a population of Italian patients affected by ED, and to compare the efficacy and safety of these two drugs. Material and Methods. From October 2003 to November 2004, thirteen Italian centers enrolled ED patients (age >18) being in steady and naïve relation to ED treatment, both through PDE5 inhibitors and any other treatment option. These patients were randomized to sildenafil or tadalafil for 12 weeks, after which they were switched to the alternative treatment for a further 12 weeks. The preference was evaluated through the Treatment Preference Question (TPQ): “During this clinical trial you have taken tadalafil and sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Which medication do you prefer to take for the next 8 weeks of treatment?”. Moreover, patients were asked to express their preference as “strong” or “moderate” and to answer some questions to clarify the reasons behind their preference. SEP and IIEF-EF questionnaires were used for a comparison of efficacy. Results. 167 patients were enrolled, 144 of whom completed both treatment periods. On being asked the TPQ, 75% of patients (n=108) decided to continue treatment with tadalafil, in particular because it made it possible to have an erection many hours after taking the medication (first or second preference reason for 64.8% of patients), while 25% (n=36) preferred sildenafil (p=0.001). Both drugs improved the IIEF-EF and SEP scores compared to baseline, with a slightly but significantly greater improvement with tadalafil for both parameters. Conclusions. Tadalafil and sildenafil are both effective and well tolerated. Most of the patients prefer tadalafil thanks to the possibility of having sexual intercourse many hours after taking the medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document