Due Process Hearing Case Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 71-73
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman ◽  
Marni Gail Jones
2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 60-62
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 68-70
Author(s):  
David F. Bateman

Author(s):  
Jim Underwood ◽  
Edin Tabak

In this paper, a case study of the evolution of an organisational intranet is used to compare the concepts of “materiality” with actor-network theory’s black-boxing. The authors argue that information systems need to become material through “due process”. Through this paper, questions arise as to what types of material allies are useful in this process, and whether these allies can co-evolve (or “co-materialise”) with the system. In this case there seemed to be existing technical actors, but the authors question whether this is always the case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document