The management of displaced humeral shaft fractures – A survey of UK shoulder and elbow surgeons

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322098694
Author(s):  
Abdul Ahad ◽  
Aziz Haque ◽  
Alison Armstrong ◽  
Amit Modi ◽  
Radhakant Pandey ◽  
...  

Introduction Indications for surgical management of displaced humeral shaft fractures are not clearly established, leading to variations in practice. The aim of this study was to determine the scale of these variations in the UK practice to help design a future national trial. Methods An online survey was sent to all surgeon members of British Elbow and Shoulder Society to help define humeral shaft fractures, fracture displacement as well as indications for operative and non-operative management. Patient and injury related factors considered important when managing humeral shaft fractures were investigated. Results The survey achieved a response rate of 32% (104/327). There was a lack of consensus on definitions for humeral shaft fractures and fracture displacement. A functional brace was the most common form of non-operative treatment (63%). Majority immobilise humeral shaft fractures for 4–8 weeks or until callus are visible (62%) with a similar number considering operative treatment if adequate signs of healing are not present at around 12–16 weeks. Around half of our respondents exclusively use plates with variations in preference of approach and a minority (2%) exclusively use intra-medullary nails. Conclusion The significant variation in management of displaced humeral shaft fractures in the UK suggests a clear need to evaluate clinical and cost effectiveness through a multi-centre randomised trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-242
Author(s):  
Harry William Sargeant ◽  
Luke Farrow ◽  
Scott Barker ◽  
Kapil Kumar

Background Humeral shaft fractures are common but debate still occurs as to whether these are best managed operatively or non-operatively. We sought to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies to clarify the optimal treatment. Methods We performed a search for all randomised and non-randomised comparative studies on humeral shaft fracture. We included only those with an operative and non-operative cohort in adult patients. We undertook a meta-analysis of the following outcome measures: nonunion, malunion, delayed union, iatrogenic nerve injury and infection. Non-operative management was with a functional brace. Results Non-operative management resulted in a significantly higher nonunion rate of 17.6% compared to 6.3% with fixation. Operative management had a significantly higher iatrogenic nerve injury rate of 3.4% and infection rate of 3.7%. All nonunions within the included studies went on to union after plate fixation. There was no significant difference in delayed union or patient reported outcome measures. There was a significantly increased risk of malunion with non-operative treatment however this did not correlate with the outcome. Discussion Our findings suggest that in the majority of cases, humeral shaft fractures can be managed with non-operative treatment, and any subsequent nonunion should be treated with plate fixation.


Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran C. Mahabier ◽  
Lucas M.M. Vogels ◽  
Bas J. Punt ◽  
Gert R. Roukema ◽  
Peter Patka ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antony Denard ◽  
Justin E. Richards ◽  
William T. Obremskey ◽  
Michael C. Tucker ◽  
Mark Floyd ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Westrick ◽  
Benjamin Hamilton ◽  
Paul Toogood ◽  
Bradford Henley ◽  
Reza Firoozabadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document