Geomechanics and rock physics modeling approach to interpreting time-lapse seismic response during CO2 injection in Tomakomai

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihisa Ashida ◽  
Koji Kashihara ◽  
Kimiaki Ochi ◽  
Yutaka Tanaka
Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Zhao ◽  
Mark E. Willis ◽  
Tanya Inks ◽  
Glenn A. Wilson

Several recent studies have advanced the use of time-lapse distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) vertical seismic profile (VSP) data in horizontal wells for determining hydraulically stimulated fracture properties. Hydraulic fracturing in a horizontal well typically generates vertical fractures in the rock medium around each stage. We model the hydraulically stimulated formation with vertical fracture sets about the lateral wellbore as a horizontally transverse isotropic (HTI) medium. Rock physics modeling is used to relate the anisotropy parameters to fracture properties. This modeling was used to develop an inversion for P-wave time delay to fracture height and density of each stage. Field data from two horizontal wells were analyzed, and fracture height evaluated using this technique agreed with microseismic analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 424-432
Author(s):  
Manika Prasad ◽  
Stanislav Glubokovskikh ◽  
Thomas Daley ◽  
Similoluwa Oduwole ◽  
William Harbert

Seismic techniques are the main monitoring tools for CO2 storage projects, especially in saline aquifers with good porosity. The majority of existing commercial and pilot CO2 injections have resulted in clear time-lapse seismic anomalies that can be used for leakage detection as well as refinement of the reservoir models to conform with the monitoring observations. Both tasks are legal requirements imposed on site operators. This paper revisits the rock-physics effects that may play an important role in the quantitative interpretation of seismic data. First, we briefly describe a standard approach to the rock-physics modeling of CO2 injections: Gassmann-type fluid substitution accounts for the presence of compressible CO2 in the pore space, and dissolution/precipitation of the minerals changes the pore volume. For many geologic conditions and injection scenarios, this approach is inadequate. For example, dissolution of the carbonate cement may weaken the rock frame, wave-induced fluid flow between CO2 patches can vary the magnitude of the seismic response significantly for the same saturation, the fluid itself might undergo change, and the seal might act as a sink for CO2. Hence, we critically review the effects of some recent advances in understanding CO2 behavior in the subsurface and associated rock-physics effects. Such a review should help researchers and practitioners navigate through the abundance of published work and design a rock-physics modeling workflow for their particular projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document