Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine

Background: This study evaluated the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 for acute treatment of migraine. Methods: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-stage adaptive study with two interim efficacy analyses to facilitate optimal dose selection. Migraine patients were initially randomized to MK-3207 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mg or placebo to treat a moderate/severe migraine. One or more doses were to be discontinued based on the first interim analysis and a lower or higher dose could be added based on the second interim analysis. The primary endpoint was two-hour pain freedom. Results: A total of 547 patients took study medication. After the first interim analysis, the two lowest MK-3207 doses (2.5, 5 mg) were identified as showing insufficient efficacy. Per the pre-specified adaptive design decision rule, only the 2.5-mg group was discontinued and the five highest doses (5, 10, 20, 50, 100 mg) were continued into the second stage. After the second interim efficacy analysis, a 200 mg dose was added due to insufficient efficacy at the top three (20, 50, 100 mg) doses. A positive dose-response trend was demonstrated when data were combined across all MK-3207 doses for two-hour pain freedom ( p < .001). The pairwise difference versus placebo for two-hour pain freedom was significant for 200 mg ( p < .001) and nominally significant for 100 mg and 10 mg ( p < .05). The incidence of adverse events appeared comparable between active treatment groups and placebo, and did not appear to increase with increasing dose. Conclusions: MK-3207 was effective and generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine.

Download Full-text

“L‐ornithine L‐aspartate in acute treatment of severe hepatic encephalopathy: A double‐blind randomized controlled trial”

Hepatology ◽

10.1002/hep.32255 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Arpan Jain ◽

Barjesh Chander Sharma ◽

Bhawna Mahajan ◽

Siddharth Srivastava ◽

Ajay Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽

Acute Treatment ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Double Blind ◽

Randomized Controlled

Download Full-text

Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for prevention of headache in women with perimenstrual migraine

Cephalalgia ◽

10.1177/0333102415584308 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 36 (2) ◽

pp. 148-161 ◽

Cited By ~ 49

Author(s):

Tony W Ho ◽

Andrew P Ho ◽

Yang (Joy) Ge ◽

Christopher Assaid ◽

Regina Gottwald ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Event ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Receptor Antagonist ◽

Alanine Aminotransferase ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Cgrp Receptor ◽

Double Blind ◽

Treatment Difference ◽

Clinical Adverse Event ◽

Cgrp Receptor Antagonist

Aim The aim of this article is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of perimenstrual telcagepant, a CGRP receptor antagonist, for headache prophylaxis. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-month trial in women with migraine for ≥3 months who experienced perimenstrual headaches. Women were randomized to telcagepant 140 mg or placebo (2:1 ratio) for seven consecutive days perimenstrually. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory tests. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean monthly headache days in the subset of women reporting perimenstrual migraine (−2 days to +3 days of menses onset) and ≥5 moderate or severe migraines per month prior to entering the trial. Results Telcagepant was generally well tolerated: 66/2660 (2.5%) on telcagepant and 36/1326 (2.7%) on placebo discontinued because of a clinical adverse event. The percentages of patients with clinical adverse events, laboratory adverse events, or discontinuation because of a laboratory adverse event were also similar between treatments. Alanine aminotransferase elevations ≥3× normal occurred in 0.6% of women on telcagepant and 0.4% on placebo. Three women on telcagepant vs none on placebo had alanine aminotransferase elevations ≥8× normal. In the efficacy subset there was no significant effect of telcagepant ( n = 887) vs placebo ( n = 447) in mean monthly headache days (treatment difference −0.5 day (95% CI: −1.1, 0.1)). However, telcagepant was associated with a reduction in on-drug headache days (treatment difference −0.4 day (95% CI: –0.5, –0.2), nominal p < 0.001). Conclusions Telcagepant 140 mg taken perimenstrually for seven days was generally well tolerated, but was associated with transaminase elevations . Telcagepant did not reduce monthly headache frequency, but did reduce perimenstrual headaches.

Download Full-text