scholarly journals Thomas Szasz: The Uncompromising Rebel and Critic of Psychiatry

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 851-867
Author(s):  
Jan Domaradzki
Keyword(s):  
1980 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Goldstein

1976 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-447
Author(s):  
Pascale Gruson
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Louis Ruffalo
Keyword(s):  

Thomas Szasz ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Mantosh J. Dewan ◽  
Eugene A. Kaplan

Besides Szasz’s controversial views are brilliant contributions to clinical practice, including the following examples: (1) He elaborated the physician-patient relationship with three models—“activity-passivity,” “guidance-cooperation,” and “mutual participation.” (2) In The Ethics of Psychoanalysis (1965), he promoted “autonomous psychotherapy,” which involved noncoercive dialogue between therapist and patient that would lead to education and growth for the latter. (3) He argued that transference is part of the analyst’s judgment and the patient’s experience, and that there is a relationship between transference and learning. (4) He used principles of “object relations” theory to explicate deeply the signs and symptoms of schizophrenia. Contrary to popular belief, he was not “antipsychiatry” simpliciter. As a theorist, he clarified language and tried to understand pain. As a practicing clinician, he advocated ways to help people in distress, urged embracing the freedom and autonomy of patients, and treated them as persons with abilities to help themselves.


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee S. Weinberg ◽  
Richard E. Vatz

In a previous issue C. G. Schoenfeld attempted to disprove Thomas Szasz’ theory that mental illness is a “myth” and to dispute Szasz’ contention that current views of “mental illness” promote violent subjugation of human freedom in institutional and legal settings. This article argues that typical of many who criticize Dr. Szasz, Mr. Schoenfeld misunderstands and misrepresents Szasz’ rich theoretical arguments concerning “mental illness” and the prevalent use in law and institutional psychiatry of medical models for analyzing human behavior. Additionally, the authors urge responsible researchers to further pursue the implications of an accurate understanding of Szasz’ arguments for legal theory and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document